CVE-2015-2638
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u95, 7u80, and 8u45; JavaFX 2.2.80; and Java SE Embedded 7u75 and 8u33 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors related to 2D.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceUnspecified vulnerability in the Java SE 2D graphics subsystem affecting versions 6u95, 7u80, 8u45, JavaFX 2.2.80, and Java SE Embedded 7u75/8u33. Allows remote attackers to achieve full compromise (confidentiality, integrity, availability) via unknown vectors in the 2D rendering code.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.6.0= 1.7.0= 1.8.0= 1.6.0= 1.7.0= 1.8.0= 2.2.80CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if Java (JRE/JDK) is installedRun 'java -version' in a command prompt or terminal. On Windows, also check for Java installations in C:\Program Files\Java\ or C:\Program Files (x86)\Java\Affected if No Java installation is found, then this CVE does not apply. If Java is installed, proceed to version check.
-
Identify the exact Java versionRun 'java -version' and note the full version string (for example: 1.8.0_45). Also run 'javac -version' if JDK is installed to confirm the JDK version.Affected if The installed version matches or falls within: 1.6.0 (any subversion up to 95), 1.7.0 (any subversion up to 80), or 1.8.0 (any subversion up to 45). Versions prior to these ranges are also potentially affected if they are older patch releases of 6u, 7u, or 8u.
-
Confirm JavaFX installation and version (if applicable)Check for JavaFX runtime installations. On Windows, look in the Java installation directory for javafx runtime files, or run a JavaFX application and check its runtime version.Affected if JavaFX 2.2.80 is installed.
-
Verify if Java 2D graphics subsystem is in useThis vulnerability affects the Java 2D rendering code. Any Java application using AWT, Swing, or Java2D APIs exercises this code path. Check for running Java GUI applications or services that render graphical content.Affected if Any Java application that uses AWT, Swing, or Java2D graphics is potentially vulnerable. This includes most Java GUI applications and any code using java.awt.Graphics2D.
The environment is affected if Java JDK or JRE version 1.6.0 through the affected patch levels (6u95, 7u80, 8u45), or JavaFX 2.2.80 is installed and the system runs or serves Java applications that utilize the 2D graphics subsystem.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply Oracle Critical Patch Update (CPU) for July 2015 or later which addresses this vulnerability; alternatively upgrade to a Java version beyond those listed as affected.
Java SE 6u101+/Java SE 7u85+/Java SE 8u51+/JavaFX 8u60+ (or latest available stable release)
- 1. Identify all systems running vulnerable Java/JDK versions (1.6.0, 1.7.0, 1.8.0) or JavaFX 2.2.80
- 2. Download the latest Java SE or JavaFX release from Oracle's official website or your distribution's package repository
- 3. For Java SE 6u95: upgrade to Java SE 6u101 or later
- 4. For Java SE 7u80: upgrade to Java SE 7u85 or later
- 5. For Java SE 8u45: upgrade to Java SE 8u51 or later
- 6. For JavaFX 2.2.80: upgrade to JavaFX 8u60 or later
- 7. For Java SE Embedded: upgrade to 7u85 or 8u60 or later as applicable
- 8. Test application functionality with the new Java version in a staging environment
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,256.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-2638 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- www.oracle.com
- www.oracle.com
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securitytracker.com
- security.gentoo.org
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-2638 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data