CVE-2015-2728
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe IndexedDatabaseManager class in the IndexedDB implementation in Mozilla Firefox before 39.0 and Firefox ESR 31.x before 31.8 and 38.x before 38.1 misinterprets an unspecified IDBDatabase field as a pointer, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption and application crash) via unspecified vectors, related to a "type confusion" issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMozilla Firefox's IndexedDB implementation contains a type confusion vulnerability in the IndexedDatabaseManager class. The code misinterprets an unspecified IDBDatabase field as a pointer, leading to memory corruption. This allows remote attackers to potentially execute arbitrary code or cause denial of service via unspecified vectors.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 31.0= 31.1.0= 31.1.1= 31.3.0= 31.5.1= 31.5.2= 31.5.3= 38.0<= 38.1.0= 31.1= 31.2= 31.3= 31.4= 31.5= 31.6.0= 31.7.0= 12.0= 11= 12.0= 11.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Firefox installationCheck if Mozilla Firefox is installed. On Windows, look in Program Files/Mozilla Firefox. On Linux, run 'which firefox' or check /usr/lib/firefox. On Solaris, check /usr/firefox or /opt/firefox.Affected if Firefox browser is present on the system
-
Determine Firefox version on WindowsOpen Firefox, click menu (three bars) > Help > About Firefox, or navigate to about:support, to view the exact version number.Affected if Version matches 31.0, 31.1.0, 31.1.1, 31.3.0, 31.5.1, 31.5.2, 31.5.3, 38.0, 38.1.0 or any version <= 38.1.0
-
Determine Firefox version on LinuxRun 'firefox --version' or 'rpm -q firefox' for RPM-based distros, or 'dpkg -l firefox' for Debian-based.Affected if Version matches any in the 31.x series up to 31.7.0 (ESR) or 38.x up to 38.1.0 (release)
-
Check SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop/ServerOn SUSE systems, run 'rpm -q firefox' or check installed packages via YaST. For SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11, verify if Firefox package is installed.Affected if Firefox version on SUSE matches affected 31.x or 38.x ranges
-
Check Oracle SolarisOn Solaris, run 'pkginfo | grep firefox' or check /opt/firefox for installation.Affected if Firefox version on Solaris 11.3 matches affected ranges
The environment is affected if Mozilla Firefox (or Firefox ESR) is installed with a version matching 31.x through 38.1.0 (or 31.1-31.7 for ESR), since the type confusion vulnerability exists in the IndexedDB implementation of those versions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Mozilla Firefox to version 39.0 or later (or ESR 31.8/38.1 or later for extended support releases) to patch the type confusion vulnerability in the IndexedDB implementation.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-2728 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- www.mozilla.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- www.oracle.com
- www.oracle.com
- bugzilla.mozilla.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- rhn.redhat.com
- www.debian.org
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securitytracker.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- security.gentoo.org
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-2728 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data