CVE-2015-2886
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditediBaby M6 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information, related to the ibabycloud.com service.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe iBaby M6 baby monitor has an information disclosure vulnerability allowing remote attackers to obtain sensitive information through the ibabycloud.com cloud service. This is a remote unauthenticated access issue that exposes data such as credentials, device identifiers, or user information.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify iBaby M6 device on your networkLocate the baby monitor device and verify the model is iBaby M6 by checking the device label, packaging, or your network device inventory. Look for 'M6' or 'iBaby' in device names.Affected if The device is an iBaby M6 Baby Monitor on your network
-
Verify connection to ibabycloud.comPerform a DNS lookup for ibabycloud.com or use network monitoring tools (such as netstat, Wireshark, or your router's connection logs) to check if any device is communicating with ibabycloud.com.Affected if DNS resolves to an IP address or network traffic to ibabycloud.com is observed
-
Test unauthenticated cloud service accessAttempt to access ibabycloud.com API endpoints using a web browser or curl command without providing any credentials. Common endpoints may include paths returning device data or user information.Affected if The cloud service returns sensitive data (such as credentials, device identifiers, user accounts, or device status) without requiring authentication
-
Inspect network traffic for data exposureUse a network sniffer or proxy to capture traffic between the iBaby M6 device and ibabycloud.com. Look for unencrypted transmissions containing device IDs, passwords, or personal information.Affected if Sensitive information such as credentials, device serial numbers, or user data is transmitted in plaintext or easily decoded format
If you have an iBaby M6 device communicating with ibabycloud.com and that cloud service responds to unauthenticated requests with sensitive data, your environment is affected by CVE-2015-2886.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataContact iBaby for firmware/cloud service updates; if unavailable, consider network segmentation to limit exposure of the device and associated cloud service.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,328.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-2886 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-2886 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data