Headend System ReleaseOperating system · Cisco

CVE-2015-4230

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v2.0 Published 2015-07-06
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
87/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Memory leak in Cisco Headend System Release allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via unspecified vectors, aka Bug ID CSCus91854.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Memory leak vulnerability in Cisco Headend System Release allows remote attackers to exhaust system memory by sending unspecified vectors, leading to denial of service. The vulnerability stems from improper memory management where allocated memory is not properly released, causing progressive memory consumption until the system becomes unresponsive.

MitigationContact Cisco support to obtain the vendor patch for this vulnerability (CSCus91854). Implement network segmentation and rate limiting as interim controls to reduce attack surface while waiting for the official fix.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Headend System ReleaseOperating system
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Cisco Headend System Release is deployed
    Identify the installed product by checking system documentation, running 'show version' on the Cisco device CLI, or checking the system's software identifier. This product is typically part of Cisco's digital video headend infrastructure.
    Affected if The system is confirmed to be running Cisco Headend System Release software (any version)
  2. Monitor system memory usage
    Execute memory monitoring commands available on the Cisco Headend System (such as 'show memory' or platform-specific health check commands). Record current used/available memory values.
    Affected if Memory usage shows abnormally high consumption approaching system limits (typically above 80-90% of available memory)
  3. Check for progressive memory growth
    Collect memory usage snapshots over a 15-30 minute period. Compare the memory consumption trend to identify if memory is continuously increasing without returning to baseline levels.
    Affected if Memory usage progressively increases over time without stabilization, indicating a potential memory leak condition
  4. Verify denial of service condition
    Check system responsiveness and available services. Look for symptoms such as slow response, service timeouts, inability to process requests, or system unresponsiveness correlated with high memory usage.
    Affected if System is experiencing denial of service symptoms (unresponsive, slow, or unavailable services) concurrent with memory exhaustion

A system is affected if it is running any version of Cisco Headend System Release and exhibits progressive memory consumption leading to denial of service conditions.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Contact Cisco support to obtain the vendor patch for this vulnerability (CSCus91854). Implement network segmentation and rate limiting as interim controls to reduce attack surface while waiting for the official fix.

Fix this in Headend System Release Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,600
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,160.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-4230 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-4230 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data