Telepresence Advanced Media GatewayApplication · Cisco

CVE-2015-4254

MEDIUM · 6.8 CVSS v2.0 Published 2015-07-10
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
77/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability on Cisco TelePresence Advanced Media Gateway devices with software 1.1(1.40) allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users, aka Bug ID CSCuu90732.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Cisco TelePresence Advanced Media Gateway software version 1.1(1.40) allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users by tricking authenticated users into submitting malicious requests.

MitigationUpgrade to a patched software version if available; alternatively, implement CSRF tokens, SameSite cookie attributes, and Origin/Referer header validation on all state-changing operations, and disable unused administrative interfaces.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Telepresence Advanced Media GatewayApplication
Affected:= 1.1\(1.40\)

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
M
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Cisco TelePresence Advanced Media Gateway installation
    Locate the device or software on your network. This is typically dedicated hardware or a virtual appliance. Check network scans or asset inventory for 'Cisco TelePresence Advanced Media Gateway' or 'AMG' entries.
    Affected if The device or software is present in your environment.
  2. Determine the installed software version
    Access the device administrative interface or check system information. The web interface typically shows version in 'System' > 'About' or similar. CLI access may use 'show version' or 'show system information' commands.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.1(1.40).
  3. Verify the web administrative interface is exposed
    Determine if the web-based management interface (typically HTTPS on port 443 or 8443) is accessible from network segments where users or attackers could trigger malicious requests.
    Affected if The web interface is accessible and authentication sessions can be obtained.
  4. Inspect for CSRF protections
    Examine HTTP responses from the web interface for anti-CSRF tokens in forms, SameSite cookie attributes, and check if POST requests properly validate Origin or Referer headers before processing state-changing operations.
    Affected if No CSRF tokens exist in forms, SameSite cookies are not set, and Origin/Referer headers are not validated.

You are affected if Cisco TelePresence Advanced Media Gateway version 1.1(1.40) is deployed with its web administrative interface accessible and no CSRF protections are implemented.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to a patched software version if available; alternatively, implement CSRF tokens, SameSite cookie attributes, and Origin/Referer header validation on all state-changing operations, and disable unused administrative interfaces.

Fix this in Telepresence Advanced Media Gateway Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation10.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
28.0 hours of engineering $4,920
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,872.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-4254 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-4254 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data