Telepresence Video Communication Server SoftwareApplication · Cisco

CVE-2015-4329

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v2.0 Published 2015-08-20
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The administrator web interface in Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server (VCS) X8.5.2 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary OS commands via crafted HTTP requests, aka Bug ID CSCuv11796.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server (VCS) X8.5.2 contains a command injection vulnerability in its administrator web interface. Authenticated remote attackers can execute arbitrary operating system commands by sending specially crafted HTTP requests to the web interface.

MitigationApply the Cisco patch for bug ID CSCuv11796 to upgrade beyond X8.5.2, or upgrade to a patched version of the VCS software. Restrict administrative interface access to trusted networks and users.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Telepresence Video Communication Server SoftwareApplication
Affected:= x8.5.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
Single
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed VCS software version
    Access the administrator web interface and navigate to the version information page, or use the CLI command 'xCommand SystemUnitSoftwareVersion' to retrieve the exact software version running on the device
    Affected if The installed version is exactly X8.5.2 (no other versions are listed as affected)
  2. Confirm the administrator web interface is enabled
    Check the VCS configuration via CLI using 'xConfiguration HTTP Proxy' or through the web interface under Administration > System settings to verify if the admin web service is active
    Affected if The web interface is accessible on the default ports (HTTP port 80 or HTTPS port 443) and responds to authentication requests
  3. Verify administrative user accounts
    Review the list of administrative users configured on the VCS through the web interface under Users > Administrator users, or use the CLI command 'xCommand UserList' to enumerate accounts
    Affected if Unexpected or unauthorized administrator accounts exist that were not created by your organization
  4. Examine web server access logs for injection attempts
    Retrieve and review web interface access logs from the VCS. Look for HTTP requests containing suspicious patterns such as shell metacharacters (e.g., |, ;, &, $ , `) in parameters, especially to endpoints that accept user input
    Affected if Logs contain requests with command injection patterns or unexpected system commands in HTTP parameters
  5. Check for signs of remote code execution
    Review system logs and examine the VCS filesystem for unexpected files, scripts, or processes. Look for new cron jobs or startup scripts that were not authored by your administrators
    Affected if Unexpected files, processes, or scheduled tasks are present on the system that correspond to attacker-executed commands

A user is affected only if the installed Cisco TelePresence VCS software is exactly version X8.5.2 AND the administrator web interface is enabled and accessible, regardless of whether authentication has been compromised.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the Cisco patch for bug ID CSCuv11796 to upgrade beyond X8.5.2, or upgrade to a patched version of the VCS software. Restrict administrative interface access to trusted networks and users.

Fix this in Telepresence Video Communication Server Software Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
13.0 hours of engineering $2,280
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-4329 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-4329 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data