CVE-2015-4731
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u95, 7u80, and 8u45; Java SE Embedded 7u75; and Java SE Embedded 8u33 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via vectors related to JMX.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceUnspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE JMX (Java Management Extensions) component allows remote attackers to fully compromise confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The CVSS 10 score indicates trivial exploitability with complete impact.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.6.0= 1.7.0= 1.8.0= 1.6.0= 1.7.0= 1.8.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Java versionRun 'java -version' or 'java -fullversion' from the command line to obtain the exact Java version numberAffected if Version displays as 1.6.0, 1.7.0, or 1.8.0 (any update patch level within these major versions)
-
Locate Java installation directoryOn Windows: check JAVA_HOME environment variable or registry. On Linux/Unix: run 'which java' and 'readlink -f $(which java)' to find the JRE/JDK installation pathAffected if The installation path contains references to JDK or JRE 1.6, 1.7, or 1.8
-
Verify JMX is enabledSearch startup scripts (startup.sh, catalina.sh, standalone.conf) for '-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote' or similar JMX flags, or check for port 9090 or 9010 which are common JMX default ports in process listings (netstat -an | grep -E '9090|9010')Affected if JMX remote management flags are present in startup configuration or JMX ports are actively listening
-
Check for JMX authentication disabledReview JMX configuration files or startup parameters for '-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.authenticate=false' which disables JMX authenticationAffected if JMX is enabled AND authentication is explicitly disabled (vulnerability impact is higher)
-
Confirm Java vendor is OracleRun 'java -verbose' or check the vendor string from 'java -version' output (look for 'Oracle Corporation' or 'Java(TM)')Affected if Vendor is Oracle and version falls in affected range
System is affected if running Oracle JDK/JRE versions 1.6.0, 1.7.0, or 1.8.0 with JMX remote management enabled, regardless of authentication settings.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to a patched Java version beyond 8u45 (for Java 8), 7u80 (for Java 7), or 6u95 (for Java 6). If JMX is not required, disable it to reduce attack surface.
Java SE 6u95+/7u80+/8u45+ (July 2015 CPU or later)
- 1. Identify all systems running affected Java versions (1.6.0, 1.7.0, 1.8.0)
- 2. Download the appropriate patched Java version from Oracle's official website or your organization's Java distribution channel
- 3. For Java 1.6.x systems: upgrade to Java SE 6u95 or later
- 4. For Java 1.7.x systems: upgrade to Java SE 7u80 or later
- 5. For Java 1.8.x systems: upgrade to Java SE 8u45 or later
- 6. Test applications thoroughly after upgrade to ensure compatibility
- 7. Deploy the updated Java runtime to all affected production systems
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,328.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-4731 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- www.oracle.com
- www.oracle.com
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- www.debian.org
- www.debian.org
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securitytracker.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- security.gentoo.org
- security.gentoo.org
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-4731 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data