CVE-2015-4902
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u101, 7u85, and 8u60 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors related to Deployment.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceOracle Java SE contains an unspecified vulnerability in the Deployment component affecting versions 6u101, 7u85, and 8u60. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors, likely through malicious applets or web-based Java deployments.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 5.6= 5.7= 5.0= 6.0= 7.0= 6.7= 7.2= 7.3= 7.4= 7.5= 7.2= 7.3= 5.0_s390x= 6.0_s390x= 7.0_s390x= 6.7_s390x= 7.2_s390x= 7.3_s390x= 7.4_s390x= 7.5_s390x= 5.0_ppc= 6.0_ppc64= 7.0_ppc64= 6.7_ppc64= 7.2_ppc64= 7.3_ppc64= 7.4_ppc64= 7.5_ppc64CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Java versionRun 'java -version' or 'java -fullversion' from command line to obtain the installed Java SE versionAffected if Version displays as 6u101, 7u85, or 8u60
-
Check Java deployment toolkit statusInspect Java Control Panel or check for 'deployment.properties' file typically located in $JAVA_HOME/lib/deploy/ or user home directory under .java/deployment/Affected if Deployment component is present and enabled on a vulnerable Java version
-
Verify Java installation pathUse 'which java' or 'echo $JAVA_HOME' to locate the Java installation directory, then check the 'release' file for exact version stringAffected if The release file contains version strings matching 1.6.0_101, 1.7.0_85, or 1.8.0_60
-
Check for Java Web Start usageLook for .jnlp files or Java Web Start launcher (javaws) on the system, as the Deployment component handles Java Web StartAffected if Java Web Start is configured and the underlying Java version is 6u101, 7u85, or 8u60
You are affected if any installed Java runtime is version 6u101, 7u85, or 8u60 and the Java Deployment component (Java Web Start or Java Plugin) is enabled or in use.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Oracle Java SE to a version beyond the affected releases (6u101, 7u85, 8u60). Oracle Critical Patch Updates address this and similar Deployment component vulnerabilities.
Java 6u105 or later (for Java 6 deployments); Java 7u91 or later (for Java 7 deployments); Java 8u77 or later (for Java 8 deployments)
- Identify the installed Java package using: rpm -qa | grep -i java or java -version
- For RHEL 5.x systems: Run 'yum update java-1.6.0-ibm' or 'yum update java-1.7.0-ibm' depending on the installed version
- For RHEL 6.x and 7.x systems: Run 'yum update java-1.7.0-openjdk' or 'yum update java-1.8.0-openjdk' depending on the installed version
- Alternatively, for Oracle Java SE, download and install the fixed versions: Java 6u105+, Java 7u91+, or Java 8u77+ from Oracle's official JDK downloads
- After update, verify the fixed version using: java -version
- Restart any running Java applications to ensure they use the updated runtime
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-4902 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- www.oracle.com
- www.oracle.com
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securitytracker.com
- access.redhat.com
- security.gentoo.org
- www.cisa.gov
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-4902 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data