Websphere Mq LightApplication · Ibm

CVE-2015-4941

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.0 Published 2016-01-01
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM WebSphere MQ Light 1.x before 1.0.2 mishandles abbreviated TLS handshakes, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (MQXR service crash) via unspecified vectors.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

IBM WebSphere MQ Light versions prior to 1.0.2 contains a denial of service vulnerability where the MQXR service crashes when handling malformed or unexpected abbreviated TLS handshakes. Remote attackers can exploit this by sending specially crafted TLS handshake messages, causing the service to become unavailable.

MitigationUpgrade IBM WebSphere MQ Light to version 1.0.2 or later to address the TLS handshake handling flaw. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, consider network-level controls to limit exposure of the MQXR service to untrusted networks.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Websphere Mq LightApplication
Affected:= 1.0= 1.0.0.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify WebSphere MQ Light installation
    Check for WebSphere MQ Light installation directory and retrieve version information. On Windows, look in Program Files/IBM/WebSphere MQ Light. On Linux/Unix, check /opt/mqlight or the installation directory. Locate the version file or run 'mqlight -version' if available.
    Affected if The installed version is 1.0 or 1.0.0.1 (versions prior to 1.0.2)
  2. Verify MQXR service status
    Determine if the MQXR service is running. On Windows, check Windows Services for 'WebSphere MQ Light' or 'MQXR Service'. On Linux, check process list for mqlight or xr service processes using 'ps aux | grep mqlight' or 'systemctl status mqlight'.
    Affected if The MQXR service is enabled and running, exposing the TLS handshake handler
  3. Confirm network exposure of MQXR service
    Check listener configuration for the MQXR service port (default 5671 for AMQPS or 1883 for MQTT). Review firewall rules and network ACLs. Use 'netstat -an | grep 5671' or 'netstat -an | grep 1883' to identify listening addresses.
    Affected if The MQXR service is listening on accessible network interfaces (0.0.0.0 or external IP) rather than localhost only
  4. Review TLS configuration
    Examine MQXR service configuration files for TLS settings. Check client connection definitions and whether TLS/SSL is enabled. Look for any non-standard or abbreviated TLS handshake configurations.
    Affected if TLS is enabled for the MQXR service, making it susceptible to malformed handshake handling vulnerability

A user is affected if WebSphere MQ Light version 1.0 or 1.0.0.1 is installed with the MQXR service enabled and accessible over the network.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade IBM WebSphere MQ Light to version 1.0.2 or later to address the TLS handshake handling flaw. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, consider network-level controls to limit exposure of the MQXR service to untrusted networks.

Fix this in Websphere Mq Light Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,140
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,024.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-4941 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-4941 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data