CandlepinApplication · Candlepinproject

CVE-2015-5187

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.0 Published 2017-07-25
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
74/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Candlepin allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information by obtaining Java exception statements as a result of excessive web traffic.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Candlepin (a Java-based subscription management component, typically part of Red Hat Satellite) exposes sensitive information through Java exception stack traces that are returned to users during periods of high web traffic. The excessive traffic triggers errors that leak Java exception details to remote attackers.

MitigationImplement proper exception handling to catch and handle errors without exposing stack traces or exception messages to end users; ensure custom error pages are served instead of raw Java exceptions.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
CandlepinApplication
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Candlepin is installed
    Check for Candlepin Java application by locating the candlepin.war file or the Candlepin service process (typically runs in /var/lib/candlepin or similar application directories). Use commands like 'find / -name candlepin*' or check running Java processes for candlepin.
    Affected if Candlepin is present in the environment and running as a web application
  2. Verify error handling configuration
    Inspect the application's web.xml or equivalent error-page configuration (often in /var/lib/candlepin/embedded/candlepin.conf or in the embedded Tomcat configuration). Look for <error-page> directives and check if they specify location to custom error pages rather than allowing default exception handling.
    Affected if No custom error pages are configured or <error-page> entries are missing for error codes 500, 403, 404, and exceptions
  3. Test for stack trace disclosure
    Trigger an error condition by making invalid requests to the Candlepin API endpoint (such as malformed JSON submissions to /candlepin/consumers or /candlepin/owners) and capture the HTTP response. Use: curl -X POST http://localhost:8080/candlepin/consumers -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{invalid}'
    Affected if The HTTP 500 response body contains Java exception class names, stack trace lines (at ..., caused by...), or file path references
  4. Check error response headers and body
    Review actual HTTP responses returned by Candlepin during error conditions. Examine both response headers (Content-Type) and response body for any indication of Java exception output.
    Affected if Error responses contain raw Java exception messages, stack traces, or reveal internal package/class names from the Candlepin Java code

If Candlepin is running and any error response exposes Java exception stack traces, class names, or internal code details to clients, the environment is affected by CVE-2015-5187.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper exception handling to catch and handle errors without exposing stack traces or exception messages to end users; ensure custom error pages are served instead of raw Java exceptions.

Fix this in Candlepin Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-5187 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-5187 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data