CVE-2015-5241
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAfter logging into the portal, the logout jsp page redirects the browser back to the login page after. It is feasible for malicious users to redirect the browser to an unintended web page in Apache jUDDI 3.1.2, 3.1.3, 3.1.4, and 3.1.5 when utilizing the portlets based user interface also known as 'Pluto', 'jUDDI Portal', 'UDDI Portal' or 'uddi-console'. User session data, credentials, and auth tokens are cleared before the redirect.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceOpen redirect vulnerability in Apache jUDDI's logout JSP page (versions 3.1.2-3.1.5) in the portlet-based UI. After clearing session data, credentials, and auth tokens, the logout page redirects users to the login page but fails to validate the redirect destination, allowing attackers to specify arbitrary URLs for phishing or malicious redirects.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.1.2= 3.1.3= 3.1.4= 3.1.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Apache jUDDI versionLocate and inspect the juddi-version file, manifest, or war file metadata to determine the exact version of Apache jUDDI deployed in your environment.Affected if The installed version matches 3.1.2, 3.1.3, 3.1.4, or 3.1.5.
-
Confirm portlet-based UI deploymentCheck whether the portlet-based UI component (juddi-portlet) is deployed in your application server. Look for portlet WAR files, portlet descriptor files, or the presence of portlet-specific directories in the deployed application.Affected if The portlet-based UI is deployed and active.
-
Locate the logout JSPFind the logout JSP page within the portlet-based UI deployment. Search for files named logout.jsp or similar in the portlet web application directory.Affected if A logout JSP file exists in the portlet UI component.
-
Inspect redirect logicExamine the logout JSP source code for redirect functionality. Look for code that handles a redirect parameter, forward, or sendRedirect after clearing session data. Check whether the destination URL is validated against a whitelist or restricted to relative paths.Affected if The logout page contains redirect code that does NOT validate or restrict the redirect destination URL.
You are affected if you run Apache jUDDI versions 3.1.2 through 3.1.5, have the portlet-based UI deployed, and the logout JSP contains unrestricted redirect logic.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict validation of redirect URLs in the logout JSP to ensure only relative paths or whitelisted domains are allowed; validate and sanitize any redirect parameters before use.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,424.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-5241 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-5241 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data