CVE-2015-5359
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedJuniper Junos OS 12.1X44 before 12.1X44-D50, 12.1X46 before 12.1X46-D35, 12.1X47 before 12.1X47-D25, 12.3 before 12.3R9, 12.3X48 before 12.3X48-D10, 13.2 before 13.2R7, 13.3 before 13.3R5, 14.1R3 before 14.1R3-S2, 14.1 before 14.1R4, 14.2 before 14.2R2, and 15.1 before 15.1R1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and RDP crash) via a large number of BGP-VPLS advertisements with updated BGP local preference values.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA NULL pointer dereference vulnerability exists in the Routing Protocol Process (RDP) of Juniper Junos OS. When processing a large number of BGP-VPLS advertisements with updated BGP local preference values, the RDP crashes due to the NULL pointer dereference, causing a denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 12.1x44= 12.1x46= 12.1x47= 12.3= 12.3x48= 13.2= 13.3= 14.1= 14.1x53= 14.2= 15.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Junos OS versionExecute 'show version' or 'show system information' on the Junos device CLIAffected if The installed version matches any of: 12.1X44, 12.1X46, 12.1X47, 12.3, 12.3X48, 13.2, 13.3, 14.1, 14.1X53, 14.2, or 15.1
-
Verify BGP-VPLS is configuredRun 'show configuration protocols bgp' and search for 'family vpls' or 'family inet-vpls' under the BGP configuration hierarchyAffected if BGP-VPLS family is enabled and configured on the device
-
Confirm RDP process stabilityExecute 'show system crash' or review the system log file via 'show log messages' for recent routing protocol daemon (rpd) crash entriesAffected if The rpd process has crashed with a NULL pointer dereference error, or crash dumps reference the RDP component
The device is affected if it runs a vulnerable Junos version AND has BGP-VPLS configured, potentially showing rpd crash evidence in system logs.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Junos OS to versions beyond the fixed releases (12.1X44-D50, 12.1X46-D35, 12.1X47-D25, 12.3R9, 12.3X48-D10, 13.2R7, 13.3R5, 14.1R3-S2, 14.1R4, 14.2R2, or 15.1R1). If immediate upgrade is not possible, consider filtering or rate-limiting suspicious BGP-VPLS updates as a temporary workaround.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-5359 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-5359 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data