AxiomApplication · Axiomsl

CVE-2015-5463

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2019-04-03
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 9.5.3 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
AxiomSL's Axiom java applet module (used for editing uploaded Excel files and associated Java RMI services) 9.5.3 and earlier allows remote attackers to (1) access data of other basic users through arbitrary SQL commands, (2) perform a horizontal and vertical privilege escalation, (3) cause a Denial of Service on global application, or (4) write/read/delete arbitrary files on server hosting the application.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

AxiomSL's Axiom Java applet module (versions 9.5.3 and earlier) used for editing uploaded Excel files contains critical vulnerabilities in its Java RMI services. Attackers can execute arbitrary SQL commands to access other users' data, perform horizontal and vertical privilege escalation, cause denial of service, and most critically, write/read/delete arbitrary files on the server hosting the application.

MitigationUpgrade AxiomSL Axiom to a version beyond 9.5.3, restrict network access to Java RMI services, implement strict input validation, and apply least-privilege database access controls.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
AxiomApplication
Affected:<= 9.5.3

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if AxiomSL Axiom is installed
    Check for AxiomSL Axiom installation directories, services, or applications on the server. Common locations include C:\Program Files\AxiomSL or /opt/axiomsl on Windows or Linux systems respectively. Also check for running processes named 'Axiom' or related Java processes.
    Affected if AxiomSL Axiom software is found on the system
  2. Determine the installed version of AxiomSL Axiom
    Locate version information in the application's installation directory, typically in a version.txt, about.ini, or manifest file. Also check the Windows Registry or Linux package management system if installed via installer.
    Affected if The installed version is 9.5.3 or earlier
  3. Verify if the Java applet module is enabled
    Check the Axiom application configuration files for the Java applet module settings, typically in config.xml, app.properties, or similar configuration files within the Axiom installation directory. Look for references to 'applet', 'Excel editing', or 'Java RMI' functionality.
    Affected if The Java applet module for Excel file editing is enabled in the configuration
  4. Check if Java RMI services are network-accessible
    Review network configuration, firewall rules, or Axiom's service binding settings to determine if Java RMI ports (typically dynamic or configured in the application) are exposed to the network or accessible from untrusted networks.
    Affected if Java RMI services are exposed to the network without proper access restrictions

A user is affected if AxiomSL Axiom version 9.5.3 or earlier is installed with the Java applet module enabled and its RMI services are accessible.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 9.5.3
Interim mitigation

Upgrade AxiomSL Axiom to a version beyond 9.5.3, restrict network access to Java RMI services, implement strict input validation, and apply least-privilege database access controls.

Fix this in Axiom Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation10.0 h
  • Implementation20.0 h
  • Testing16.0 h
  • Review / QA6.0 h
52.0 hours of engineering $9,080
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $14,528.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-5463 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-5463 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data