CVE-2015-5516
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMemory leak in the last hop kernel module in F5 BIG-IP LTM, GTM, and Link Controller 10.1.x, 10.2.x before 10.2.4 HF13, 11.x before 11.2.1 HF15, 11.3.x, 11.4.x, 11.5.x before 11.5.3 HF2, and 11.6.x before HF6, BIG-IP AAM 11.4.x, 11.5.x before 11.5.3 HF2 and 11.6.0 before HF6, BIG-IP AFM and PEM 11.3.x, 11.4.x, 11.5.x before 11.5.3 HF2, and 11.6.0 before HF6, BIG-IP Analytics 11.x before 11.2.1 HF15, 11.3.x, 11.4.x, 11.5.x before 11.5.3 HF2, and 11.6.0 before HF6, BIG-IP APM and ASM 10.1.0 through 10.2.4, 11.x before 11.2.1 HF15, 11.3.x, 11.4.x, 11.5.x before 11.5.3 HF2, and 11.6.0 before HF6, BIG-IP Edge Gateway, WebAccelerator, and WOM 10.1.x, 10.2.x before 10.2.4 HF13, 11.x before 11.2.1 HF15, and 11.3.0, BIG-IP PSM 10.1.x, 10.2.x before 10.2.4 HF13, 11.x before 11.2.1 HF15, 11.3.x, and 11.4.x before 11.4.1 HF, Enterprise Manager 3.0.0 through 3.1.1, BIG-IQ Cloud and Security 4.0.0 through 4.5.0, BIG-IQ Device 4.2.0 through 4.5.0, and BIG-IQ ADC 4.5.0 might allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a large number of crafted UDP packets.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA memory leak exists in the last hop kernel module of F5 BIG-IP products (LTM, GTM, Link Controller, AAM, AFM, PEM, Analytics, APM, ASM, and related BIG-IQ variants). The vulnerability is triggered by sending a large number of crafted UDP packets to the affected device, causing memory consumption to grow until a denial of service occurs.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 4.5.0= 10.0.0= 10.0.1= 10.1.0= 10.2.0= 10.2.1= 10.2.2= 10.2.3= 10.2.4= 11.0.0= 11.1.0= 11.2.0= 11.2.1= 10.1.0= 10.2.0= 10.2.1= 10.2.2= 10.2.3= 10.2.4= 11.0.0= 11.1.0= 11.2.0= 11.2.1= 11.3.0= 11.4.0= 10.1.0= 10.2.0= 10.2.1= 10.2.2= 10.2.3= 10.2.4= 11.0.0= 11.1.0= 11.2.0= 11.2.1= 11.3.0= 10.1.0= 10.2.0= 10.2.1= 10.2.2= 10.2.3= 10.2.4= 11.0.0= 11.1.0= 11.2.0= 11.2.1= 11.3.0= 11.4.0= 4.0.0= 4.1.0= 4.2.0= 4.3.0= 4.4.0= 4.5.0= 10.1.0= 10.2.0= 10.2.1= 10.2.2= 10.2.3= 10.2.4= 11.0.0= 11.1.0= 11.2.0= 11.2.1= 11.3.0= 10.1.0= 10.2.0= 10.2.1= 10.2.2= 10.2.3= 10.2.4= 11.0.0= 11.1.0= 11.2.0= 11.2.1= 11.3.0= 11.4.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the F5 product and versionRun 'tmsh show /sys version' or 'tmsh show /sys hardware' to identify the installed product module and version numberAffected if The displayed version matches one of the affected versions listed in the CVE (e.g., LTM 10.x-11.2.1, APM 10.1.0-11.4.0, ASM 10.1.0-11.4.0, GTM 10.1.0-11.4.0, BIG-IQ 4.0.0-4.5.0)
-
Confirm the last hop kernel module is loadedRun 'tmsh list /net lapp' or 'tmsh show /net lapp' to check if the Last Hop (LAPP) kernel module is configured and activeAffected if The Last Hop module is enabled and processing traffic in the environment
-
Check for abnormal memory consumptionRun 'tmsh show /sys memory' or monitor /proc/meminfo via bash to observe kernel memory usage, particularly in the network stackAffected if Memory usage is abnormally high or steadily increasing, especially in kernel memory pools associated with UDP packet processing
-
Monitor UDP traffic statisticsRun 'tmsh show /net stats udp' or use 'tmsh show /net lapp stats' to view UDP packet counters and last hop module statisticsAffected if There is a high volume of incoming UDP traffic and the counters show excessive packet processing by the last hop module
If the F5 product version matches the affected list AND the last hop kernel module is enabled, the environment is vulnerable to the memory leak denial-of-service condition described in this CVE.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the relevant hotfixes (10.2.4 HF13, 11.2.1 HF15, 11.5.3 HF2, or 11.6.x HF6) to the affected F5 products, or upgrade to a patched version. If immediate patching is not possible, consider filtering or rate-limiting incoming UDP traffic as a temporary mitigation.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-5516 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-5516 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data