Centum Cs 1000 FirmwareOperating system · Yokogawa

CVE-2015-5626

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-02-05
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Stack-based buffer overflow in Yokogawa CENTUM CS 1000 R3.08.70 and earlier, CENTUM CS 3000 R3.09.50 and earlier, CENTUM CS 3000 Entry R3.09.50 and earlier, CENTUM VP R5.04.20 and earlier, CENTUM VP Entry R5.04.20 and earlier, ProSafe-RS R3.02.10 and earlier, Exaopc R3.72.00 and earlier, Exaquantum R2.85.00 and earlier, Exaquantum/Batch R2.50.30 and earlier, Exapilot R3.96.10 and earlier, Exaplog R3.40.00 and earlier, Exasmoc R4.03.20 and earlier, Exarqe R4.03.20 and earlier, Field Wireless Device OPC Server R2.01.02 and earlier, PRM R3.12.00 and earlier, STARDOM VDS R7.30.01 and earlier, STARDOM OPC Server for Windows R3.40 and earlier, FAST/TOOLS R10.01 and earlier, B/M9000CS R5.05.01 and earlier, B/M9000 VP R7.03.04 and earlier, and FieldMate R1.01 or R1.02 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (network-communications outage) via a crafted packet.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Stack-based buffer overflow in Yokogawa CENTUM and related industrial control software allows remote attackers to cause denial of service (network-communications outage) by sending crafted packets to affected systems.

MitigationApply vendor patches to upgrade to fixed versions; implement network segmentation and access controls to limit exposure of ICS components to untrusted networks as interim measures.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Centum Cs 1000 FirmwareOperating system
Affected:<= r3.08.70
Centum Cs 3000 FirmwareOperating system
Affected:<= r3.09.50
Centum Cs 3000 Entry FirmwareOperating system
Affected:<= r3.09.50
Centum Vp FirmwareOperating system
Affected:<= r5.04.20
Centum Vp Entry FirmwareOperating system
Affected:<= r5.04.20
Prosafe Rs FirmwareOperating system
Affected:<= r3.02.10
ExaopcApplication
Affected:<= r3.72.00
ExapilotApplication
Affected:<= r3.96.10

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Yokogawa products
    Review system inventory or check the installed software on the engineering workstation, HMI server, or control processor for Yokogawa CENTUM, Prosafe, Exaopc, or Exapilot components
    Affected if Any of the eight affected products are present on the network
  2. Check CENTUM CS 1000 firmware version
    Access the control processor or engineering station and retrieve the firmware version information (typically via system diagnostics, firmware update utility, or version info in the system configuration)
    Affected if Firmware version is r3.08.70 or earlier (r3.08.70 and below)
  3. Check CENTUM CS 3000 or CS 3000 Entry firmware version
    Access the control processor or engineering station and retrieve the firmware version information
    Affected if Firmware version is r3.09.50 or earlier (r3.09.50 and below)
  4. Check CENTUM VP or VP Entry firmware version
    Access the control processor or engineering station and retrieve the firmware version information
    Affected if Firmware version is r5.04.20 or earlier (r5.04.20 and below)
  5. Check Prosafe RS firmware version
    Access the safety controller or engineering station and retrieve the firmware version information
    Affected if Firmware version is r3.02.10 or earlier (r3.02.10 and below)
  6. Check Exaopc or Exapilot software version
    Check the installed software version via the application properties, about dialog, or installed programs list on the host system
    Affected if Exaopc version is r3.72.00 or earlier, or Exapilot version is r3.96.10 or earlier

The environment is affected if any Yokogawa CENTUM, Prosafe RS, Exaopc, or Exapilot installation matches the affected version ranges and the network communications feature is enabled, allowing external packets to reach the vulnerable component.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor patches to upgrade to fixed versions; implement network segmentation and access controls to limit exposure of ICS components to untrusted networks as interim measures.

Fix this in Centum Cs 1000 Firmware Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing12.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
30.0 hours of engineering $5,160
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,256.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-5626 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-5626 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data