CVE-2015-6340
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) component in the CDMA implementation on Cisco ASR 5000 devices with software 19.0.M0.60737 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (hamgr process restart) via a crafted header in a PMIPv6 packet, aka Bug ID CSCuv63280.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) component in the CDMA implementation on Cisco ASR 5000 devices with software 19.0.M0.60737 contains a vulnerability where a remote attacker can send a crafted PMIPv6 packet with a malformed header, causing the hamgr process to restart and resulting in denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 19.0.m0.60737CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm device model is Cisco ASR 5000Run 'show hardware' or 'show version' CLI command to verify the device is an ASR 5000 seriesAffected if Device is not a Cisco ASR 5000 - not affected
-
Check exact software versionRun 'show version' or 'show software' to display the installed software version numberAffected if Version is NOT exactly 19.0.M0.60737 - not affected
-
Verify PMIPv6 feature is enabledRun 'show pmipv6 status' or 'show configuration | include pmipv6' to check if Proxy Mobile IPv6 is configured and activeAffected if PMIPv6 is not configured or enabled - not affected (exploitation requires PMIPv6 to be active)
-
Confirm CDMA implementation is in useRun 'show cdma statistics' or 'show running-config | include cdma' to verify CDMA services are enabled on the systemAffected if CDMA services are not configured - likely not affected (vulnerability is in the CDMA implementation path)
The system is affected only if it is running exactly version 19.0.M0.60737 AND has PMIPv6 enabled in a CDMA configuration - the crafted packet must target the PMIPv6 component within the CDMA implementation to trigger the hamgr process restart.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the vendor patch for Bug ID CSCuv63280 or upgrade to a Cisco fixed software version. If patching is not immediately possible, consider network segmentation to limit exposure to untrusted PMIPv6 traffic sources.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-6340 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-6340 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data