CVE-2015-6361
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe administrative web interface on Cisco DPC3939 (XB3) devices with firmware 121109aCMCST allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary commands via unspecified fields, aka Bug ID CSCuw86170.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe administrative web interface on Cisco DPC3939 (XB3) devices with firmware 121109aCMCST contains a command injection vulnerability allowing remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary operating system commands via unspecified input fields in the web management interface.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 121109acmcst_baseCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- Single
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device modelAccess the device administrative interface or check the device label/marketing materials to confirm the model is Cisco DPC3939 (XB3) Wireless Residential Voice GatewayAffected if The device is not a Cisco DPC3939 (XB3)
-
Check the firmware versionLog into the administrative web interface and navigate to the status or firmware information page, or use the device's web-based diagnostic tools to display the current firmware versionAffected if The firmware version is exactly 121109acmcst_base (this specific version is vulnerable)
-
Verify the administrative web interface is enabledAttempt to access the device's web management interface via HTTP or HTTPS on the default management ports (typically 80 or 443)Affected if The administrative web interface responds and is accessible
-
Check if remote management is enabledIn the administrative interface, navigate to the remote management or administration settings to determine if remote web access is permitted from outside the local networkAffected if Remote management is enabled and the web interface is accessible from external networks
-
Assess network exposure of the management interfaceDetermine if the device's web management port is exposed to untrusted networks by checking router/firewall port forwarding rules or NAT configurationsAffected if The administrative interface is reachable from untrusted networks (such as the internet)
A user is affected if they have a Cisco DPC3939 (XB3) device running firmware version 121109acmcst_base with the administrative web interface accessible, particularly if remote management is enabled or the interface is exposed to untrusted networks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor firmware updates if available; otherwise, restrict administrative web interface access to trusted networks only, disable remote management if not required, and monitor for unauthorized access attempts.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,304.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-6361 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-6361 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data