CVE-2015-6367
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCisco Aironet 1800 devices with software 8.1(131.0) allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) by improperly establishing many SSHv2 connections, aka Bug ID CSCux13374.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis vulnerability in Cisco Aironet 1800 devices (software 8.1.131.0) allows remote attackers to cause denial of service by exhausting CPU resources through improperly establishing numerous SSHv2 connections. The device fails to properly manage or limit concurrent SSH connections, leading to resource consumption that renders the device unavailable.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 8.1\(131.0\)CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device modelUse 'show version' or 'show inventory' command to confirm the hardware is a Cisco Aironet 1800 series access pointAffected if Device is not a Cisco Aironet 1800 series model
-
Check the software versionUse 'show version' command to display the installed Cisco Aironet software versionAffected if Software version is exactly 8.1(131.0)
-
Verify SSH management is enabledUse 'show ssh' or 'show ip ssh' command to check if SSH is enabled on the deviceAffected if SSH service is enabled and reachable from untrusted networks
-
Review SSH connection statisticsUse 'show ssh' or 'show connections' to display active SSH sessions and connection countsAffected if There are numerous concurrent SSH connections or connection attempts observed
A user is affected if they have a Cisco Aironet 1800 device running software version 8.1(131.0) with SSH management interface exposed and accessible to untrusted networks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the Cisco-supplied software update for this vulnerability (CSCux13374) to fix the SSH connection handling. Additionally, implement network access controls to restrict SSH management access to trusted networks and consider rate-limiting or firewall rules to limit SSH connection attempts.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-6367 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-6367 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data