ProviewApplication · Eaton

CVE-2015-6471

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.0 Published 2015-12-23
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Eaton Cooper Power Systems ProView 4.x and 5.x before 5.1 on Form 6 controls and Idea and IdeaPLUS relays does not properly initialize padding fields in Ethernet packets, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information by reading packet data.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The ProView software on Eaton Cooper Power Systems Form 6 controls and Idea/IdeaPLUS relays fails to properly initialize padding fields in outgoing Ethernet packets. This causes residual memory data to be transmitted in network packets, potentially exposing sensitive information such as configuration details, credentials, or other memory-resident data to remote attackers who can capture network traffic.

MitigationUpgrade ProView to version 5.1 or later per vendor instructions. If immediate patching is not feasible, implement network segmentation to isolate affected devices and deploy packet capture monitoring to detect attempts to exploit this information disclosure.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
ProviewApplication
Affected:= 4.0= 5.0= 5.0.1= 5.0.2= 5.0.3= 5.0.4= 5.0.5= 5.0.6= 5.0.7= 5.0.8= 5.0.9= 5.0.10

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify ProView installation
    Locate ProView software on the system. Check for installation directories such as C:\Program Files\ProView or C:\ProView, and look for ProView executable files (proview.exe or similar). On industrial control equipment, access the device management interface to confirm ProView is running as the management software.
    Affected if ProView software is found to be installed or running on the system.
  2. Determine ProView version
    Right-click the ProView application icon and select 'Properties', then view the 'Version' tab. Alternatively, open ProView and navigate to Help > About to display the version information. If accessing via the managed device web interface, check the firmware or software version field.
    Affected if The version displayed is 4.0, 5.0, 5.0.1, 5.0.2, 5.0.3, 5.0.4, 5.0.5, 5.0.6, 5.0.7, 5.0.8, 5.0.9, or 5.0.10.
  3. Verify network exposure
    Confirm that the ProView-managed device (Eaton Cooper Power Systems Form 6 controls or Idea/IdeaPLUS relays) is connected to a network where its Ethernet traffic can be captured. Use network scanning tools or check device network configuration to verify network connectivity status.
    Affected if The ProView-managed device is network-connected and its outbound Ethernet packets could be captured by an attacker on the same network segment.

You are affected if ProView version 4.0 through 5.0.10 is installed on a network-connected Eaton Cooper Power Systems Form 6 control or Idea/IdeaPLUS relay, because uninitialized padding in outgoing packets may leak sensitive memory contents to network observers.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade ProView to version 5.1 or later per vendor instructions. If immediate patching is not feasible, implement network segmentation to isolate affected devices and deploy packet capture monitoring to detect attempts to exploit this information disclosure.

Fix this in Proview Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
24.0 hours of engineering $4,260
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,816.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-6471 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-6471 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data