CVE-2015-6637
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe MediaTek misc-sd driver in Android before 5.1.1 LMY49F and 6.0 before 2016-01-01 allows attackers to gain privileges via a crafted application, aka internal bug 25307013.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the MediaTek misc-sd driver in Android versions before 5.1.1 LMY49F and before the 2016-01-01 patch for Android 6.0. The flaw allows a locally-installed crafted application to execute code with elevated privileges by exploiting the misc-sd driver, likely through improper input validation or insufficient access controls within the kernel driver.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 4.4.4= 5.0= 5.1.1= 6.0= 6.0.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check the Android OS versionNavigate to Settings > About Phone > Android version, or run command: getprop ro.build.version.releaseAffected if The version listed is 4.4.4, 5.0, 5.1.1, 6.0, or 6.0.1
-
Check the security patch levelNavigate to Settings > About Phone > Build number, or run command: getprop ro.build.version.security_patchAffected if The patch level is blank, missing, or shows a date before January 1, 2016 (such as 2015-12-01 or 2015-11-05)
-
Identify the chipset hardwareRun command: getprop ro.hardware, or view /proc/cpuinfo and look for MediaTek or MTK in the hardware informationAffected if The device uses a MediaTek chipset (commonly identified as mt6580, mt6735, mt6753, etc.)
-
Verify the misc-sd driver presenceCheck if the misc-sd device node exists by running: ls -la /dev/misc-sd or ls -la /dev/block/misc-sd, or check kernel modules with: lsmod | grep misc_sdAffected if The misc-sd device node or kernel module is present on the device
A device is affected if it runs Android 4.4.4, 5.0, 5.1.1, 6.0, or 6.0.1 with a pre-January-2016 patch level, uses a MediaTek chipset, and has the misc-sd driver present.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the January 2016 Android security patch level or later; for affected devices no longer receiving OTA updates, consider network segmentation, EMM policies restricting app installation, or device replacement.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-6637 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-6637 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data