CVE-2015-7192
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe accessibility-tools feature in Mozilla Firefox before 42.0 on OS X improperly interacts with the implementation of the TABLE element, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code by using an NSAccessibilityIndexAttribute value to reference a row index.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in Firefox's OS X accessibility-tools feature allows attackers to trigger a denial of service or potentially achieve arbitrary code execution by manipulating NSAccessibilityIndexAttribute values when referencing TABLE element row indices. The flaw stems from improper input validation in the accessibility API's interaction with table row indexing.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 41.0.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify OS X is the running operating systemRun 'uname -s' or check System Preferences to confirm the operating system is OS X. This vulnerability only affects Firefox on OS X platforms.Affected if The system is running any OS other than OS X (the vulnerability does not apply to Windows or Linux Firefox installations)
-
Confirm Firefox browser is installedCheck for Firefox installation by looking in /Applications/Firefox.app or running 'mdfind kMDItemCFBundleIdentifier == org.mozilla.firefox' in Terminal.Affected if Firefox is not installed on the system
-
Determine installed Firefox versionOpen Firefox, go to Help > About Firefox, or run '/Applications/Firefox.app/Contents/MacOS/firefox -version' in Terminal to retrieve the version number.Affected if The installed Firefox version is 41.0.2 or earlier (versions 42.0 and later are not affected)
-
Check if Firefox accessibility features are enabledIn Firefox, type 'about:config' in the address bar, then search for 'accessibility'. Verify if 'accessibility.force遥' or related accessibility settings are enabled, or check System Preferences > Accessibility to confirm OS-level accessibility access is granted to Firefox.Affected if Accessibility features are enabled in Firefox (the vulnerability exploits the OS X accessibility API interaction with table row indexing)
A user is affected if they are running Firefox version 41.0.2 or earlier on OS X with accessibility features enabled, as the flaw requires the accessibility API to be accessible for exploitation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Firefox to version 42.0 or later on all affected OS X systems. If immediate patching is not possible, consider restricting access to untrusted content or using alternative accessibility configurations until the update can be deployed.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-7192 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-7192 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data