CVE-2015-7256
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedZyXEL NWA1100-N, NWA1100-NH, NWA1121-NI, NWA1123-AC, and NWA1123-NI access points; P-660HN-51, P-663HN-51, VMG1312-B10A, VMG1312-B30A, VMG1312-B30B, VMG4380-B10A, VMG8324-B10A, VMG8924-B10A, VMG8924-B30A, and VSG1435-B101 DSL CPEs; PMG5318-B20A GPONs; SBG3300-N000, SBG3300-NB00, and SBG3500-N000 small business gateways; GS1900-8 and GS1900-24 switches; and C1000Z, Q1000, FR1000Z, and P8702N project models use non-unique X.509 certificates and SSH host keys.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMultiple ZyXEL networking devices (access points, DSL CPEs, GPONs, switches, and project models) ship with pre-installed, non-unique X.509 certificates and SSH host keys that are identical across all devices of the same model. This allows attackers to potentially impersonate devices or conduct man-in-the-middle attacks since the same certificate/key can be reused across thousands of devices.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Retrieve the SSL certificate fingerprint from the deviceRun: openssl s_client -connect <deviceIP>:443 2>/dev/null | openssl x509 -noout -fingerprintAffected if The certificate fingerprint matches the default certificate known for that specific ZyXEL model, or matches the certificate from another device of the same model
-
Extract the SSH host key from the deviceRun: ssh-keyscan -t rsa,dsa,ecdsa <deviceIP> to retrieve the SSH host key, or access the device filesystem via firmware extraction to read /etc/ssh/ssh_host_*Affected if The SSH host key matches the default key shipped with that specific ZyXEL model, or matches the key from another device of the same model
-
Compare SSH host keys across multiple devices of the same modelIf you have two or more ZyXEL devices of the same model, run ssh-keyscan on each and compare the outputs directlyAffected if Two or more devices of the same model return identical SSH host keys, indicating non-unique pre-installed keys
-
Compare SSL certificates across devices of the same modelRetrieve the certificate from each device using openssl s_client and compare the fingerprints: openssl s_client -connect <deviceIP>:443 2>/dev/null | openssl x509 -noout -fingerprintAffected if Two or more devices of the same model have identical certificate fingerprints, indicating reuse of the same pre-installed certificate
A device is affected if its SSH host key or X.509 certificate is identical to another device of the same model, meaning the default non-unique keys were never replaced.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataGenerate and deploy unique X.509 certificates and SSH host keys on affected devices. Contact ZyXEL for firmware updates that may address this issue.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-7256 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-7256 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data