CVE-2015-7448
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSQL injection vulnerability in IBM Maximo Asset Management 7.1 through 7.1.1.13, 7.5.0 before 7.5.0.9 IFIX003, and 7.6.0 before 7.6.0.3 IFIX001; Maximo Asset Management 7.5.0 before 7.5.0.9 IFIX003, 7.5.1, and 7.6.0 before 7.6.0.3 IFIX001 for SmartCloud Control Desk; and Maximo Asset Management 7.1 through 7.1.1.13 and 7.2 for Tivoli IT Asset Management for IT and certain other products allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified vectors.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in IBM Maximo Asset Management allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified vectors. The vulnerability affects versions 7.1 through 7.1.1.13, 7.5.0 before 7.5.0.9 IFIX003, and 7.6.0 before 7.6.0.3 IFIX001 across multiple Maximo product lines including SmartCloud Control Desk and Tivoli IT Asset Management.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.1= 7.1.1= 7.1.1.2= 7.1.1.3= 7.1.1.4= 7.1.1.5= 7.1.1.6= 7.2= 7.2.0.1= 7.2.0.2= 7.2.1= 7.2.1.1= 7.1= 7.1.1= 7.1.1.1= 7.1.1.2= 7.1.1.5= 7.1.1.6= 7.1.1.7= 7.1.1.8= 7.1.1.9= 7.1.1.10= 7.1.1.11= 7.1.1.12= 7.1= 7.5= 7.5.0.0= 7.5.0.1= 7.5.0.2= 7.5.0.3= 7.5.0.4= 7.5.0.5= 7.5.0.6= 7.5.0.7= 7.5.0.8= 7.5.0.9= 7.1= 7.1= 7.1.1= 7.5= 7.1= 7.5= 7.6= 7.1= 7.1.1= 7.5= 7.5.0.1= 7.5.1= 7.1= 7.1.0.1= 7.1.1.0= 7.1.2= 7.5= 7.5.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed Maximo product versionCheck the Maximo installation directory for version information. Common locations include the maximo.properties file, the about dialog in the Maximo application, or query the MAXVERSION system property in the Maximo database.Affected if The installed version falls within 7.1 to 7.1.1.13, 7.5.0 through 7.5.0.8, or 7.6.0 through 7.6.0.2 and the corresponding IFIX patches are not applied.
-
Determine if IFIX003 for version 7.5.0 is appliedCheck the maximo/ifxtemp directory or examine the Maximo system information for installed IFIX packages. Look for IFIX003 specifically for the 7.5.0.x line.Affected if Running version 7.5.0.x and IFIX003 is NOT installed.
-
Determine if IFIX001 for version 7.6.0 is appliedCheck the maximo/ifxtemp directory or examine the Maximo system information for installed IFIX packages. Look for IFIX001 specifically for the 7.6.0.x line.Affected if Running version 7.6.0.x and IFIX001 is NOT installed.
-
Confirm network accessibility of the Maximo applicationVerify that the Maximo web interface or API endpoints are accessible from the network. The vulnerability requires remote authenticated access.Affected if The Maximo application is exposed to the network without proper network segmentation or authentication controls.
You are affected if you are running any IBM Maximo product version 7.1 through 7.1.1.13, 7.5.0.x before 7.5.0.9 IFIX003, or 7.6.0.x before 7.6.0.3 IFIX001 and the application is network-accessible to authenticated users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the vendor-supplied IFIX patches (7.5.0.9 IFIX003 for version 7.5.0, 7.6.0.3 IFIX001 for version 7.6.0) or upgrade to supported patched versions. Additionally, implement input validation and parameterized queries as defense-in-depth while patching.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,040.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-7448 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-7448 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data