CVE-2015-7703
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe "pidfile" or "driftfile" directives in NTP ntpd 4.2.x before 4.2.8p4, and 4.3.x before 4.3.77, when ntpd is configured to allow remote configuration, allows remote attackers with an IP address that is allowed to send configuration requests, and with knowledge of the remote configuration password to write to arbitrary files via the :config command.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceNTP ntpd versions 4.2.x before 4.2.8p4 and 4.3.x before 4.3.77 contain a file write vulnerability in the pidfile and driftfile directives. When ntpd is configured to allow remote configuration, an attacker with a whitelisted IP address and knowledge of the remote configuration password can write to arbitrary files via the :config command by manipulating these directives.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 6= 7.0= 8.0= 9.0= 6.0= 7.0= 6.0= 7.0= 7.3= 7.4= 7.6= 7.7= 7.3= 7.4= 7.5= 7.6= 7.7= 7.3= 7.6= 7.7= 6.0= 7.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check ntpd versionRun 'ntpd --version' or 'ntpdc -version' to get the installed ntpd version numberAffected if Version is 4.2.x before 4.2.8p4, or 4.3.x before 4.3.77, or otherwise falls within the affected ranges.
-
Verify if remote configuration is enabledSearch the ntpd configuration file (typically /etc/ntp.conf) for 'enable mode7' or 'modifymode' directivesAffected if Remote configuration is explicitly enabled in the configuration.
-
Inspect restrict rules for remote accessExamine the 'restrict' lines in the ntpd configuration file to see which IP addresses are allowed to query or configure ntpdAffected if The restrict rules allow untrusted or broad network ranges (e.g., 'restrict default' or 'restrict 0.0.0.0' without proper masking) to perform remote configuration.
-
Check for remote configuration passwordLook for 'remoteconfig' or 'keys' directives in the ntpd configuration file that define authentication for remote configurationAffected if Remote configuration is enabled but no password is set, or the password is weak or guessable.
The environment is affected only if ntpd is running a vulnerable version (4.2.x before 4.2.8p4 or 4.3.x before 4.3.77) AND remote configuration is enabled with accessible IP addresses, regardless of password protection.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataDisable remote configuration in ntpd if not required, or strictly limit allowed IPs and use strong passwords. Update to ntpd 4.2.8p4 or 4.3.77 or later.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,376.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-7703 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-7703 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data