CVE-2015-7755
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedJuniper ScreenOS 6.2.0r15 through 6.2.0r18, 6.3.0r12 before 6.3.0r12b, 6.3.0r13 before 6.3.0r13b, 6.3.0r14 before 6.3.0r14b, 6.3.0r15 before 6.3.0r15b, 6.3.0r16 before 6.3.0r16b, 6.3.0r17 before 6.3.0r17b, 6.3.0r18 before 6.3.0r18b, 6.3.0r19 before 6.3.0r19b, and 6.3.0r20 before 6.3.0r21 allows remote attackers to obtain administrative access by entering an unspecified password during a (1) SSH or (2) TELNET session.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceJuniper ScreenOS contains a hardcoded backdoor password that grants administrative access when entered during SSH or TELNET authentication. Attackers can obtain full administrative control of affected firewall and VPN devices without knowing the legitimate credentials, by using this undisclosed password.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 6.3.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify ScreenOS versionRun 'get system information' or 'show version' command on the Juniper device to retrieve the installed ScreenOS version and build numberAffected if Version is 6.2.0r15 through 6.2.0r18, or 6.3.0r12 through 6.3.0r20 (including 6.3.0) - compare your exact version string to these ranges
-
Verify if SSH access is enabledRun 'get system ssh status' or check the configuration with 'show configuration' looking for 'set system ssh' statementsAffected if SSH is enabled on the device (the backdoor can be exploited via SSH)
-
Verify if TELNET access is enabledRun 'get system telnet status' or check the configuration for 'set system telnet' statementsAffected if TELNET is enabled on the device (the backdoor can be exploited via TELNET)
-
Review admin login logs for suspicious activityRun 'get log system' and search for administrative login events, especially from unknown IPs or at unusual times, or check for multiple failed authentication attempts followed by successful loginsAffected if Log entries show administrative logins that cannot be attributed to legitimate administrators, or show the undocumented backdoor password being used
Your device is affected if it runs ScreenOS version 6.2.0r15-r18 or 6.3.0r12-r20 (or 6.3.0) and has SSH or TELNET access enabled, allowing the hardcoded backdoor password to be used for unauthorized admin access.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply Juniper patches (6.2.0r19+, 6.3.0r21+) to remove the backdoor. Until patched, restrict SSH/TELNET management access to trusted management networks only using firewall rules or jump hosts, and monitor for unauthorized administrative sessions.
Screenos 6.3.0r21 (or respective 'b' patch for earlier versions: r12b, r13b, r14b, r15b, r16b, r17b, r18b, r19b)
- 1. Identify the current ScreenOS version by running 'get system' or 'show version' command on the device
- 2. Determine which patch level applies to your current version (e.g., if on 6.3.0r20, you need 6.3.0r21)
- 3. Download the appropriate patched release from the Juniper Netscreen ScreenOS downloads page or Juniper support portal
- 4. Upload the new ScreenOS image to the device using 'save software' or through the web UI (Device > Update > ScreenOS)
- 5. Reboot the device to load the new ScreenOS version using 'reboot' command
- 6. After reboot, verify the new version is running with 'get system' or 'show version'
- 7. Change all administrative passwords immediately after applying the patch, as a precaution
- 8. Review admin accounts and SSH/TELNET access configurations to ensure no unauthorized accounts exist
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $10,240.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-7755 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-7755 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data