CVE-2015-7796
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Cybozu Office 9.0.0 through 10.3.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-7795, CVE-2015-7797, CVE-2015-7798, CVE-2016-1149, and CVE-2016-1150.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Cybozu Office versions 9.0.0 through 10.3.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors. The medium severity (CVSS 6.1) indicates network-exploitable with low attack complexity and user interaction required.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 9.0= 9.1.0= 9.2.0= 9.2.1= 9.3.0= 9.3.1= 9.3.2= 9.9.0= 10.0.0= 10.0.1= 10.0.2= 10.1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Cybozu Office installationCheck for Cybozu Office by reviewing installed applications on the server or by accessing the application's login page and checking the banner or version information typically displayed on the interfaceAffected if Cybozu Office is not installed on the system
-
Identify installed versionAccess the administration panel or system settings within Cybozu Office to view the version information, or check the application's footer/banner which often displays the version numberAffected if The displayed version cannot be determined or is not visible
-
Compare version to affected rangeMatch the identified version against the affected list: 9.0, 9.1.0, 9.2.0, 9.2.1, 9.3.0, 9.3.1, 9.3.2, 9.9.0, 10.0.0, 10.0.1, 10.0.2, 10.1.0Affected if The installed version matches one of these exact versions
-
Check network exposureVerify if the Cybozu Office web interface is accessible from untrusted networks (internet-facing) by reviewing firewall rules and network configurationsAffected if The application is directly exposed to the internet without proper network segmentation
-
Review access logs for XSS indicatorsExamine web server access logs for suspicious patterns such as script tags, javascript: URIs, or other HTML injection attempts in request parametersAffected if Unusual XSS patterns are found in recent access logs
A defender is affected if Cybozu Office is installed and the installed version exactly matches one of: 9.0, 9.1.0, 9.2.0, 9.2.1, 9.3.0, 9.3.1, 9.3.2, 9.9.0, 10.0.0, 10.0.1, 10.0.2, or 10.1.0.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor patches for Cybozu Office 10.3.0 and later versions. Implement output encoding and input validation as defense-in-depth measures.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-7796 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-7796 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data