System Networking Switch CenterApplication · Ibm

CVE-2015-7817

HIGH · 7.1 CVSS v2.0 Published 2015-11-12
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 8.1.1.0 or later.
See remediation →
80/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Race condition in the administration-panel web service in IBM System Networking Switch Center (SNSC) before 7.3.1.5 and Lenovo Switch Center before 8.1.2.0 allows remote attackers to obtain privileged-account access, and consequently provide FileReader.jsp input containing directory traversal sequences to read arbitrary text files, via a request to port 40080 or 40443.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A race condition in the administration-panel web service of IBM SNSC before 7.3.1.5 and Lenovo Switch Center before 8.1.2.0 allows remote attackers to gain privileged-account access. Once authenticated as admin, attackers can exploit a directory traversal vulnerability in FileReader.jsp to read arbitrary text files on the system via ports 40080 or 40443.

MitigationUpgrade to IBM SNSC 7.3.1.5 or Lenovo Switch Center 8.1.2.0 or later to patch the race condition and directory traversal vulnerability. If upgrading is not immediately feasible, restrict network access to ports 40080/40443 to trusted administrative IPs.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
System Networking Switch CenterApplication
Affected:<= 7.3.1.4
Switch CenterApplication
Affected:<= 8.1.1.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
M
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
None
Availability
None

AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed product and version
    Access the administration-panel web interface or check the installed software package for IBM System Networking Switch Center or Lenovo Switch Center. Look for a version indicator in the about/help section or in the installed programs list.
    Affected if The installed version is IBM SNSC 7.3.1.4 or earlier, or Lenovo Switch Center 8.1.1.0 or earlier.
  2. Verify web service is accessible
    Attempt to access the administration-panel web service by browsing to http or https on ports 40080 or 40443. For example: http://<hostname>:40080/ or http://<hostname>:40443/.
    Affected if The administration-panel web service is reachable on ports 40080 or 40443.
  3. Check for FileReader.jsp endpoint
    Probe for the vulnerable FileReader.jsp component by requesting a URL such as: http://<hostname>:40080/FileReader.jsp or http://<hostname>:40443/FileReader.jsp.
    Affected if FileReader.jsp is present and responds to requests.
  4. Test for directory traversal vulnerability
    Send a crafted request to FileReader.jsp attempting to access a system file outside the web root, such as: http://<hostname>:40080/FileReader.jsp?file=../../../../../../etc/passwd
    Affected if The response contains content from files outside the intended directory, indicating the directory traversal is functional.

You are affected if the installed version is IBM SNSC 7.3.1.4 or earlier, or Lenovo Switch Center 8.1.1.0 or earlier, and the administration-panel on ports 40080/40443 is accessible and contains the vulnerable FileReader.jsp endpoint.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 8.1.1.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to IBM SNSC 7.3.1.5 or Lenovo Switch Center 8.1.2.0 or later to patch the race condition and directory traversal vulnerability. If upgrading is not immediately feasible, restrict network access to ports 40080/40443 to trusted administrative IPs.

Fix this in System Networking Switch Center Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-7817 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-7817 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data