CVE-2015-7839
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSolarWinds Log and Event Manager (LEM) allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands on managed computers via a request to services/messagebroker/nonsecurestreamingamf involving the traceroute functionality.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSolarWinds Log and Event Manager (LEM) contains a command injection vulnerability in the traceroute functionality accessible through the services/messagebroker/nonsecurestreamingamf endpoint. Remote unauthenticated attackers can send specially crafted requests to execute arbitrary operating system commands on managed devices.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if SolarWinds LEM is installedCheck for SolarWinds Log and Event Manager installation on the target system. Look for the LEM application directory, service, or management console.Affected if SolarWinds LEM software is present on the system
-
Determine the installed versionUse the LEM console or check the software version through the installed components to identify the exact version number.Affected if Any version of SolarWinds LEM is installed (all versions are affected)
-
Verify the vulnerable endpoint is network-accessibleCheck if the services/messagebroker/nonsecurestreamingamf endpoint is reachable from the network. This typically involves testing access to port 443 or the LEM management web interface.Affected if The LEM management interface with the traceroute feature is accessible over the network
-
Confirm traceroute functionality exposureDetermine whether the LEM web interface is exposed to untrusted networks without proper access controls.Affected if The management interface is accessible to unauthenticated or untrusted network attackers
If SolarWinds LEM is installed and its management interface (containing the vulnerable traceroute feature) is network-accessible, the environment is affected by this command injection vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the vendor-supplied patch or upgrade to a patched version of SolarWinds LEM. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict network access to the LEM management interfaces using firewall rules or network segmentation.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-7839 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-7839 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data