CVE-2015-7977
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedntpd in NTP before 4.2.8p6 and 4.3.x before 4.3.90 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference) via a ntpdc reslist command.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe NTP daemon (ntpd) contains a NULL pointer dereference vulnerability in versions before 4.2.8p6 and 4.3.x before 4.3.90. Attackers can trigger this by sending a crafted ntpdc reslist command, causing the daemon to crash and resulting in a denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 6= 9.3= 10.1= 10.2= 22= 23= 8.0= 9.0= 12.04= 14.04= 16.04<= 4.2.8>= 4.3.0, < 4.3.90= 4.2.8all versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if ntpd is installedRun 'ntpd --version' or 'ntpdc -V' to check if the NTP daemon is present on the systemAffected if ntpd is not installed - the system is not affected by this specific vulnerability
-
Check the installed ntpd versionExecute 'ntpd --version' or check the package manager (dpkg -r, rpm -qi ntp) to determine the exact version numberAffected if The version is less than 4.2.8p6, or is 4.3.0 through 4.3.89, indicating the vulnerability is present
-
Verify ntpdc utility is availableCheck if the ntpdc command exists on the system by running 'which ntpdc' or 'ntpdc --version'Affected if ntpdc is not available - the specific attack vector using 'ntpdc reslist' cannot be executed
-
Confirm ntpd is network-listeningRun 'netstat -anp | grep 123' or 'ss -anp | grep 123' to see if ntpd is bound to network interfaces (not only localhost)Affected if ntpd is exposed to network access - remote attackers can send the malicious ntpdc reslist command to trigger the crash
The system is affected if ntpd is installed with a vulnerable version (before 4.2.8p6 or 4.3.0-4.3.89), ntpdc is available, and ntpd listens on accessible network ports allowing remote attackers to send the crafted reslist command.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data4.3.90
Upgrade ntpd to version 4.2.8p6 or later / 4.3.90 or later. If immediate upgrading is not feasible, restrict network access to the NTP service to prevent unauthenticated attackers from sending the malicious ntpdc command.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,424.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-7977 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- support.ntp.org
- support.ntp.org
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- tools.cisco.com
- www.debian.org
- www.oracle.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securitytracker.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- bto.bluecoat.com
- cert-portal.siemens.com
- security.FreeBSD.org
- security.gentoo.org
- security.netapp.com
- us-cert.cisa.gov
- www.kb.cert.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-7977 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data