Endpoint ProtectionApplication · Symantec

CVE-2015-8113

HIGH · 7.2 CVSS v2.0 Published 2015-11-12
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 12.1 or later.
See remediation →
77/100
Remediation priority · High
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Untrusted search path vulnerability in the client in Symantec Endpoint Protection (SEP) 12.1 before 12.1-RU6-MP3 allows local users to gain privileges via a Trojan horse DLL in a client install package. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2015-1492.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

This is a DLL hijacking (untrusted search path) vulnerability in Symantec Endpoint Protection 12.1 client versions before 12.1-RU6-MP3. Local attackers can place a malicious DLL in a client install package directory, which SEP will load with elevated privileges, enabling local privilege escalation. The flaw exists because CVE-2015-1492 was incompletely fixed.

MitigationApply the vendor patch (SEP 12.1-RU6-MP3 or later) to address this incomplete fix from CVE-2015-1492. As an interim measure, ensure strict file system permissions on SEP installation directories to prevent unauthorized DLL placement.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Endpoint ProtectionApplication
Affected:<= 12.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm SEP 12.1 is installed
    Check the installed programs or application list on the system for 'Symantec Endpoint Protection' or 'SEP' version 12.1
    Affected if Symantec Endpoint Protection 12.1 is present on the system
  2. Determine the exact SEP version
    Open the Symantec Endpoint Protection client, go to Help > About, or check the version information in the program properties to identify the full version string (such as 12.1-RU6-MP2, 12.1-RU6, etc.)
    Affected if The version shows 12.1 without RU6-MP3 or later (or any version prior to 12.1-RU6-MP3)
  3. Check if the vulnerable DLL search path condition exists
    Examine the SEP client installation directory structure for the presence of a 'Packages' or 'Install' subdirectory where SEP stores or caches client installation packages. Verify file system permissions on this directory allow limited users to write files.
    Affected if The installation package directory exists and permits write access to non-admin users
  4. Verify the incomplete fix from CVE-2015-1492 is present
    Review the SEP client behavior or logs to confirm that DLL loading from the install package directory still occurs with elevated privileges when client updates or package refresh operations run
    Affected if SEP loads DLLs from the install package directory under elevated privileges without validation

A system is affected if Symantec Endpoint Protection 12.1 is installed with a version earlier than 12.1-RU6-MP3 and the install package directory allows unauthorized DLL placement.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 12.1
Interim mitigation

Apply the vendor patch (SEP 12.1-RU6-MP3 or later) to address this incomplete fix from CVE-2015-1492. As an interim measure, ensure strict file system permissions on SEP installation directories to prevent unauthorized DLL placement.

Fix this in Endpoint Protection Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-8113 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-8113 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data