CVE-2015-8158
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe getresponse function in ntpq in NTP versions before 4.2.8p9 and 4.3.x before 4.3.90 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop) via crafted packets with incorrect values.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe getresponse function in ntpq (NTP query tool) contains a denial of service vulnerability where crafted packets with incorrect values trigger an infinite loop. This affects NTP versions before 4.2.8p9 and 4.3.x before 4.3.90, allowing remote attackers to hang the ntpq process by sending malicious responses.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 4.2.8= 4.3.0= 4.3.1= 4.3.2= 4.3.3= 4.3.4= 4.3.5= 4.3.6= 4.3.7= 4.3.8= 4.3.10= 4.3.11CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify NTP version is installedRun 'ntpq --version' or 'ntpd --version' to check the installed NTP version numberAffected if The version shown is 4.2.8 or lower, or 4.3.0 through 4.3.11 (excluding 4.3.90 and higher)
-
Confirm ntpq binary presenceRun 'which ntpq' to locate the ntpq binary, typically found in /usr/bin/ntpq or /usr/sbin/ntpqAffected if The ntpq binary exists on the system and the NTP version is in the affected range
-
Check if NTP services are network-accessibleRun 'netstat -anp | grep -E "(123|ntp)"' or 'ss -anp | grep -E "(123|ntp)"' to see if NTP ports are listening on network interfacesAffected if Port 123/UDP is listening on a non-localhost address, exposing the service to remote attackers
-
Identify active NTP client or server processesRun 'ps aux | grep -E "ntp|ntpd|ntpq"' to find running NTP-related processesAffected if ntpd or ntpq processes are running and the version is in the affected range
-
Review NTP configuration for remote accessInspect /etc/ntp.conf or /etc/ntp/ntp.conf for 'restrict' directives that allow unrestricted remote queriesAffected if The configuration permits queries from untrusted remote hosts without proper restrictions
A system is affected if it runs NTP version 4.2.8 or lower, or version 4.3.0-4.3.11, has ntpq installed, and exposes NTP services to untrusted network paths.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade NTP to version 4.2.8p9 or later (or 4.3.90+ for 4.3.x branches) to patch the vulnerable getresponse function. Additionally, restrict network access to NTP services to limit exposure to untrusted remote attackers.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-8158 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-8158 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data