CVE-2015-8236
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedArista EOS before 4.11.12, 4.12 before 4.12.11, 4.13 before 4.13.14M, 4.14 before 4.14.5FX.5, and 4.15 before 4.15.0FX1.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code as root by leveraging management-plane access, aka Bug 138716.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a critical remote code execution vulnerability in Arista EOS network switch firmware. Attackers with management-plane access can execute arbitrary code with root privileges on vulnerable switches. Affected versions span multiple EOS branches (4.11.x, 4.12.x, 4.13.x, 4.14.x, 4.15.x) prior to their respective patched releases.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 4.11.11= 4.12.5.2= 4.12.6.1= 4.12.7.1= 4.12.8= 4.12.8.1= 4.12.9= 4.12.10= 4.13.1.1f= 4.13.2.1f= 4.13.3.1f= 4.13.4.1fCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed EOS versionExecute 'show version' on the Arista switch CLI to display the EOS software versionAffected if The displayed version matches one of the affected versions: <= 4.11.11, 4.12.5.2, 4.12.6.1, 4.12.7.1, 4.12.8, 4.12.8.1, 4.12.9, 4.12.10, 4.13.1.1f, 4.13.2.1f, 4.13.3.1f, 4.13.4.1f OR falls within an unpatched branch (4.14.x before 4.14.5FX.5, 4.15.x before 4.15.0FX1.1)
-
Identify EOS branchExecute 'show version' and note the major.minor branch (e.g., 4.11, 4.12, 4.13, 4.14, 4.15)Affected if The switch runs EOS 4.11, 4.12, 4.13, 4.14, or 4.15 branch at a version prior to its respective patched release
-
Verify management plane accessibilityReview the switch configuration for management interfaces (Management0, MGMT0, etc.) using 'show management interfaces' and check for exposed IP addresses or permissive access controlsAffected if Management interfaces are reachable from untrusted networks or have no ACL restrictions, enabling an attacker to reach the management plane
-
Check for vulnerable service or featureThis vulnerability is present in the core EOS code and does not require a specific feature to be enabled; any switch running affected EOS versions is potentially vulnerableAffected if The switch is running any of the affected EOS versions listed, regardless of configuration
A switch is affected if it runs EOS version 4.11.x through 4.11.11, specific 4.12.x versions, 4.13.x versions before 4.13.14M, 4.14.x before 4.14.5FX.5, or 4.15.x before 4.15.0FX1.1 AND has management-plane network accessibility.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Arista EOS to version 4.11.12 or later (for 4.11 branch), 4.12.11 or later (for 4.12 branch), 4.13.14M or later (for 4.13 branch), 4.14.5FX.5 or later (for 4.14 branch), or 4.15.0FX1.1 or later (for 4.15 branch). Additionally, restrict management-plane access to trusted networks or use ACLs to limit exposure.
4.11.12, 4.12.11, 4.13.14M, 4.14.5FX.5, or 4.15.0FX1.1 (depending on current branch)
- Identify current EOS version using 'show version' command
- Determine which EOS branch (4.11, 4.12, 4.13, 4.14, or 4.15) is currently running
- For EOS 4.11.x: upgrade to 4.11.12 or later
- For EOS 4.12.x: upgrade to 4.12.11 or later
- For EOS 4.13.x: upgrade to 4.13.14M or later
- For EOS 4.14.x: upgrade to 4.14.5FX.5 or later
- For EOS 4.15.x: upgrade to 4.15.0FX1.1 or later
- Follow standard Arista EOS upgrade procedure using 'install' command
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,680.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-8236 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-8236 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data