CVE-2015-8241
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe xmlNextChar function in libxml2 2.9.2 does not properly check the state, which allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (heap-based buffer over-read and application crash) or obtain sensitive information via crafted XML data.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe xmlNextChar function in libxml2 2.9.2 fails to properly validate state during XML character processing, allowing crafted XML input to trigger a heap-based buffer over-read. This can cause application crashes (denial of service) or expose sensitive memory contents to attackers.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.0= 8.0= 6.0= 6.0= 6.0= 6.0= 12.04= 14.04= 15.04= 15.10= 3.0= 3.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed libxml2 versionRun `xml2 --version` or `dpkg -l | grep libxml2` (Debian/Ubuntu) or `rpm -qa | grep libxml2` (RHEL) to see the installed versionAffected if The version listed is exactly 2.9.2
-
Identify libxml2 library fileLocate the libxml2 shared library with `ldconfig -p | grep libxml2` or check `/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxml2.so.2` (path varies by system)Affected if The library file exists and its version is 2.9.2
-
Verify the linked library versionUse `ldd <application_binary>` or check the soname of the library file with `readelf -d /path/to/libxml2.so.2 | grep SONAME`Affected if The application links to libxml2 version 2.9.2
-
Confirm system distribution and versionRun `cat /etc/os-release` or `lsb_release -a` to identify the OSAffected if The system is Debian 7.0, Debian 8.0, RHEL 6.x, Ubuntu 12.04, 14.04, 15.04, or 15.10 and libxml2 is version 2.9.2
-
Check for XML parsing usageInspect running applications or services that process XML input with `ldd <binary> | grep xml` or review application dependenciesAffected if The system runs applications that link against libxml2 2.9.2 to parse XML content
You are affected if your system runs libxml2 version 2.9.2 and processes untrusted XML input with any application linked against this library version.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade libxml2 to a patched version beyond 2.9.2, or apply vendor-supplied patches that fix the state checking logic in xmlNextChar. Validate and sanitize untrusted XML input at the application layer as a defense-in-depth measure.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,864.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-8241 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- marc.info
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- www.debian.org
- www.ubuntu.com
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- h20566.www2.hpe.com
- bugzilla.gnome.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- rhn.redhat.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.oracle.com
- www.oracle.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securitytracker.com
- git.gnome.org
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-8241 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data