CVE-2015-8263
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedNETGEAR WNR1000v3 devices with firmware 1.0.2.68 use the same source port number for every DNS query, which makes it easier for remote attackers to spoof responses by selecting that number for the destination port.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe NETGEAR WNR1000v3 router with firmware 1.0.2.68 uses a static, predictable source port for all DNS queries. This reduces the entropy an attacker must guess when attempting DNS response spoofing, making DNS poisoning attacks significantly easier to execute successfully.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0.2.68all versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the router modelCheck the product label on the router or log into the admin interface (typically at 192.168.1.1) and look for the device model name in the status or general settings pageAffected if Device is not a NETGEAR WNR1000v3, then not affected by this specific CVE
-
Check the firmware versionIn the router admin interface, navigate to the firmware version or router status page. The exact path varies but is typically under Administration, Router Status, or Advanced settingsAffected if Firmware version is 1.0.2.68 or any other version (all versions of this model are affected)
-
Capture DNS traffic to observe source port behaviorUse a packet capture tool (such as Wireshark or tcpdump) on the network to capture DNS packets originating from the router. Filter for DNS queries (port 53) and observe the source port field across multiple DNS requestsAffected if The source port for DNS queries remains the same value across multiple queries, indicating a static or predictable port
You are affected if you have a NETGEAR WNR1000v3 router running any firmware version and DNS queries from the router use a static, unchanging source port.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply a firmware update from NETGEAR that randomizes DNS source ports, or implement network-level defenses such as DNSSEC validation or DNS over HTTPS/TLS on clients to cryptographically verify DNS responses.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,544.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-8263 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-8263 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data