CVE-2015-8304
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedInteger overflow in Huawei P7 phones with software before P7-L07 V100R001C01B606 allows remote attackers to gain privileges via a crafted application with the system or camera permission.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceInteger overflow vulnerability in Huawei P7 Android phones prior to software version P7-L07 V100R001C01B606 allows a malicious application possessing system or camera permissions to trigger the overflow and escalate privileges, potentially executing arbitrary code with elevated access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= p7-l07_v100r001c01b606CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm device model is Huawei P7Check the device model in Settings > About Phone > Model Number, or look for P7-L07 or similar P7 variant in the device specificationsAffected if Device is a Huawei P7 (P7-L07 or related P7 model)
-
Locate software version informationNavigate to Settings > About Phone on the Huawei P7 device and locate the Version, Software Version, or Firmware Version fieldAffected if Version information is accessible in device settings
-
Compare installed version to affected rangeCompare the displayed software version against the affected range: any version <= P7-L07 V100R001C01B606 is vulnerableAffected if Software version is P7-L07 V100R001C01B606 or any earlier version (numerically lower)
-
Check build number if availableIn Settings > About Phone > Build Number, verify the build identifier - earlier builds before the B606 patch level indicate the vulnerable versionAffected if Build number corresponds to a version earlier than B606
A user is affected if they own a Huawei P7 device running software version P7-L07 V100R001C01B606 or any earlier version, as the integer overflow vulnerability exists in those firmware releases.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate Huawei P7 devices to software version P7-L07 V100R001C01B606 or later to obtain the vendor patch addressing the integer overflow.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,392.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-8304 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-8304 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data