CVE-2015-8389
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedPCRE before 8.38 mishandles the /(?:|a|){100}x/ pattern and related patterns, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite recursion) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted regular expression, as demonstrated by a JavaScript RegExp object encountered by Konqueror.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidencePCRE library before version 8.38 contains a regex parsing vulnerability where certain patterns (such as /(?:|a|){100}x/) cause infinite recursion due to improper handling of empty alternations combined with quantifiers. This ReDoS (Regular Expression Denial of Service) vulnerability can be triggered by passing crafted regex patterns to applications using the vulnerable PCRE library, as demonstrated via JavaScript RegExp objects in Konqueror.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 22>= 5.5.0, < 5.5.32>= 5.6.0, < 5.6.18>= 7.0.0, < 7.0.3<= 8.37CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed PCRE library versionRun `pcre-config --version` or check the library file with `ls -la /usr/lib/libpcre*` and examine version info with `strings` or check package manager with `rpm -q pcre` or `dpkg -l libpcre3`Affected if Version is 8.37 or lower
-
Identify PHP version if usedRun `php -v` to get PHP version, or check via package manager with `rpm -q php` or `dpkg -l php*`Affected if PHP version is 5.5.0-5.5.31, 5.6.0-5.17.18, or 7.0.0-7.0.2
-
Check Fedora versionRun `cat /etc/fedora-release` or `rpm -q fedora-release`Affected if Running Fedora 22 specifically
-
Determine if applications accept user-supplied regexAudit application source code or configuration for usage of PCRE functions (such as preg_match, preg_match_all in PHP, or regex functions in other languages) with input that could be controlled by users. Search for patterns like preg_match with variables in the regex pattern argument.Affected if Applications accept unsanitized user input to be used as regex patterns in PCRE-based functions
-
Test for vulnerability with proof-of-concept patternIf using PHP, create a test script with the pattern `/(?:|a|){100}x/` passed to preg_match and observe if it causes excessive CPU usage or hangs. In other languages using PCRE, test the same pattern. Monitor process with `time` command or observe for hang condition.Affected if The pattern causes the application to hang, crash, or exhibit excessive resource consumption
You are affected if your PCRE library version is 8.37 or lower, or if you run the specific vulnerable PHP versions, AND your applications pass user-supplied input to PCRE regex functions without validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.5.325.6.187.0.3
Upgrade PCRE library to version 8.38 or later across all affected systems. Audit applications that accept user-supplied regex input and implement timeouts or resource limits for regex operations to prevent similar DoS conditions.
PCRE 8.38 or later (PHP 5.5.32+/5.6.18+/7.0.3+)
- Upgrade PCRE library to version 8.38 or later
- For PHP installations that bundle PCRE: upgrade PHP to version 5.5.32 or later, 5.6.18 or later, or 7.0.3 or later
- For systems with separate PCRE package (e.g., Fedora 22): update the pcre package to the version containing PCRE 8.38 or newer
- After upgrading, restart any services that use PCRE or PHP to ensure the new library is loaded
- Verify the fix by testing that the vulnerable regex pattern no longer causes infinite recursion
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-8389 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-8389 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data