CVE-2015-8556
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedLocal privilege escalation vulnerability in the Gentoo QEMU package before 2.5.0-r1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceLocal privilege escalation vulnerability in Gentoo's QEMU package before version 2.5.0-r1, allowing an unprivileged user to gain root access on the host system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2.4.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Gentoo Linux distributionCheck if the system is Gentoo by examining /etc/gentoo-release or running 'uname -a' to see if it shows gentooAffected if System is not Gentoo - this specific vulnerability affects only Gentoo's QEMU package distribution
-
Check if QEMU is installed via Gentoo PortageRun 'emerge --search qemu' or 'equery list qemu' to see if QEMU packages are installed using Gentoo's package managerAffected if QEMU is not installed via Portage - the vulnerability is in Gentoo's packaged version of QEMU
-
Identify the exact Qemu Qemu package versionRun 'emerge -av qemu' or 'equery list Qemu-Qemu' to display the installed version of the specific Qemu Qemu packageAffected if The package is not installed - this specific package must be present for the flaw to apply
-
Compare installed version against affected rangeExamine the version number from the previous step and compare it to the affected versions: any version of Qemu Qemu <= 2.4.1Affected if Installed version is 2.4.1 or lower, or the version does not show 2.5.0-r1 or later
A Gentoo system is affected if it has the Qemu Qemu package installed with a version of 2.4.1 or lower (versions prior to 2.5.0-r1).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Gentoo QEMU package to version 2.5.0-r1 or later; if immediate patching is not feasible, restrict QEMU access to trusted users and monitor for unauthorized access attempts.
QEMU 2.5.0-r1 or later (Gentoo) / QEMU 2.5.0 or later (upstream)
- 1. Ensure you have root privileges on the Gentoo system
- 2. Sync the Gentoo package repository: `emerge --sync` or `eix-sync`
- 3. Update the QEMU package to version 2.5.0-r1 or later: `emerge --update app-emulation/qemu`
- 4. If specific QEMU variants are installed (e.g., qemu-user, qemu-system-x86_64), update those as well: `emerge --update app-emulation/qemu app-emulation/qemu-user`
- 5. Rebuild any packages that may depend on QEMU if needed: `emerge --deep --newuse @world`
- 6. Reboot the system if QEMU is running as a service or if kernel modules were updated
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-8556 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-8556 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data