Joomla\!Application · Joomla

CVE-2015-8563

MEDIUM · 6.8 CVSS v2.0 Published 2015-12-16
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
77/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the com_templates component in Joomla! 3.2.0 through 3.3.x and 3.4.x before 3.4.6 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Joomla's com_templates component allows remote attackers to forge requests on behalf of authenticated users. The vulnerability stems from missing or insufficient anti-CSRF tokens in the template management functionality, enabling attackers to trick authenticated administrators into performing unintended template configuration changes.

MitigationUpdate Joomla to version 3.4.6 or later, which includes proper CSRF token validation in the com_templates component. Additionally, implement SameSite cookie attributes and verify referrer headers as defense-in-depth measures.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Joomla\!Application
Affected:= 3.2.0= 3.2.1= 3.2.2= 3.2.3= 3.2.4= 3.3.0= 3.3.1= 3.3.2= 3.3.3= 3.3.4= 3.3.5= 3.4.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
M
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Joomla version
    Log into the Joomla administrator backend and navigate to Help > System Info > Version, or check the VERSION constant in /libraries/cms/version/version.php
    Affected if The version shown is any of: 3.2.0, 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.3, 3.2.4, 3.3.0, 3.3.1, 3.3.2, 3.3.3, 3.3.4, 3.3.5, or 3.4.0
  2. Confirm administrator access to template manager
    Navigate to Extensions > Templates in the administrator panel to verify the com_templates component is accessible
    Affected if Authenticated administrators have access to the template management interface in an affected Joomla version
  3. Verify CSRF token absence in template form
    Inspect the HTML source of any template editing page in Extensions > Templates > Templates. Check if the form includes a hidden input with name token or a csrf.token value
    Affected if No anti-CSRF token field is present in template management forms (the form lacks token validation)
  4. Check for active session usage
    Confirm that administrators are using active sessions in the affected version, as the attack requires a logged-in administrator
    Affected if Administrators have active sessions while using affected Joomla versions

You are affected if running any Joomla version between 3.2.0 and 3.4.0 inclusive and administrators can access the template manager component.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update Joomla to version 3.4.6 or later, which includes proper CSRF token validation in the com_templates component. Additionally, implement SameSite cookie attributes and verify referrer headers as defense-in-depth measures.

Fix this in Joomla\! Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,060
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-8563 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-8563 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data