CVE-2015-8621
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedt-coffee before 11.00.8cbe486-2 allows local users to write to ~/.t_coffee globally.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidencet-coffee versions before 11.00.8cbe486 contain a file permission vulnerability allowing local users to write to the ~/.t_coffee configuration directory, likely through improper handling of file or directory creation that permits symlink attacks or unauthorized access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 11.00.8cbe486-1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed t-coffee versionRun 't_coffee --version' or 't_coffee -version' to obtain the version numberAffected if Version is <= 11.00.8cbe486-1 or any version before 11.00.8cbe486
-
Locate the t-coffee configuration directoryCheck for the presence of ~/.t_coffee directory using 'ls -la ~ | grep t_coffee' or 'ls -la ~/.t_coffee'Affected if The ~/.t_coffee directory exists and was created by a vulnerable version of t-coffee
-
Verify permissions on ~/.t_coffee directoryRun 'ls -ld ~/.t_coffee' to view directory permissions; check if other users have write access (permissions should not include 'w' for others or group)Affected if Permissions allow write access by other local users (e.g., mode shows 'rwxrwxrwx' or includes 'w' for others/group)
-
Check for insecure file creation in configuration directoryInspect contents of ~/.t_coffee for files with overly permissive permissions using 'ls -la ~/.t_coffee'Affected if Files or subdirectories within ~/.t_coffee are world-writable or group-writable
A user is affected if t-coffee version is 11.00.8cbe486 or earlier and the ~/.t_coffee directory or its contents have permissions allowing write access by other local users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to t-coffee version 11.00.8cbe486 or later to obtain the security fix; additionally audit and correct permissions on existing ~/.t_coffee directories to prevent unauthorized local user access.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-8621 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-8621 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data