CVE-2015-8699
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in CA Release Automation (formerly LISA Release Automation) 5.0.2 before 5.0.2-227, 5.5.1 before 5.5.1-1616, 5.5.2 before 5.5.2-434, and 6.1.0 before 6.1.0-1026 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMultiple reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities exist in CA Release Automation web interface, allowing remote unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript or HTML via unspecified input vectors. The vulnerabilities affect versions 5.0.2 prior to 5.0.2-227, 5.5.1 prior to 5.5.1-1616, 5.5.2 prior to 5.5.2-434, and 6.1.0 prior to 6.1.0-1026. Successful exploitation enables session hijacking, credential theft, or malicious actions in the context of authenticated users.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 5.0.2, < 5.0.2-227>= 5.5.1, < 5.5.1-1616>= 5.5.2, < 5.5.2-434>= 6.1.0, < 6.1.0-1026CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if CA Release Automation is installedCheck common installation directories for CA Release Automation: Windows default is C:\Program Files\CA\ReleaseAutomation or C:\Program Files (x86)\CA\ReleaseAutomation. On Linux/Unix, look under /opt/CA/ or /opt/ releaseautomation. Also check for running processes named 'nolio' or 'ra' in task manager or process list.Affected if CA Release Automation software is present on the system
-
Determine the installed versionLocate the version file or About page. On Windows, check <install_dir>\server\conf\version.properties or similar. In the web interface, log in and navigate to Help > About or Administration > System Information. The version is typically displayed in format like 5.5.2-xxx or 6.1.0-xxx.Affected if The displayed version matches one of the affected ranges: 5.0.2 to 5.0.2-226, 5.5.1 to 5.5.1-1615, 5.5.2 to 5.5.2-433, or 6.1.0 to 6.1.0-1025
-
Confirm the web interface is accessibleVerify the Release Automation web interface is running and reachable. Default ports are 8080 or 8443. Access the login page via browser at http://<hostname>:8080/ or https://<hostname>:8443/. Check if the service is running via Windows Services or Linux service command.Affected if The web interface is exposed and accepts connections, making the XSS vector viable for attackers
-
Check the applied patch levelReview the full version string including the build/patch number. Compare against the fixed versions: 5.0.2-227 or higher, 5.5.1-1616 or higher, 5.5.2-434 or higher, 6.1.0-1026 or higher. This information appears in the version.properties file or the web UI About page.Affected if The version number is below these thresholds, indicating the XSS patches have not been applied
You are affected if CA Release Automation is installed and the version falls within any of the four vulnerable ranges without the corresponding patch number applied.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data5.0.2-2275.5.1-16165.5.2-434
Apply the vendor-supplied patches (5.0.2-227, 5.5.1-1616, 5.5.2-434, or 6.1.0-1026 or later) to all affected CA Release Automation installations, followed by input validation and output encoding review of custom plugins.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,864.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-8699 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-8699 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data