WiresharkApplication
CVE-2015-8732
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe dissect_zcl_pwr_prof_pwrprofstatersp function in epan/dissectors/packet-zbee-zcl-general.c in the ZigBee ZCL dissector in Wireshark 1.12.x before 1.12.9 and 2.0.x before 2.0.1 does not validate the Total Profile Number field, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds read and application crash) via a crafted packet.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceWireshark's ZigBee ZCL dissector fails to validate the Total Profile Number field in the dissect_zcl_pwr_prof_pwrprofstatersp function, allowing an out-of-bounds read when processing crafted packets with an excessively large profile number value.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data
WiresharkApplication
= 1.12.0= 1.12.1= 1.12.2= 1.12.3= 1.12.4= 1.12.5= 1.12.6= 1.12.7= 1.12.8= 2.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Wireshark versionRun 'wireshark --version' or 'tshark --version' from command line to identify the exact version numberAffected if Version is 1.12.0 through 1.12.8, or 2.0.0 (these are the affected versions)
-
Verify ZigBee ZCL dissector presenceCheck if the ZigBee ZCL dissector module is available by examining Wireshark's dissector files; on Linux check /usr/lib/wireshark/plugins/ or similar for 'zigbee' or 'zcl' related dissectorsAffected if The ZigBee ZCL dissector module is loaded and actively parsing ZigBee traffic
-
Identify ZigBee traffic processingExamine packet captures or live capture interfaces for ZigBee/ZigBee Cluster Library traffic using display filter 'zbee' or 'zcl'Affected if Wireshark is actively processing ZigBee ZCL packets with the vulnerable dissector function dissect_zcl_pwr_prof_pwrprofstatersp
-
Check for malformed ZigBee profile dataIf you have captured ZigBee packets, inspect the Power Profile cluster response (cluster 0x0500) for the Total Profile Number field; a value exceeding expected bounds indicates potential exploitationAffected if Captured packets contain ZigBee ZCL Power Profile responses with unusually large Total Profile Number values
You are affected if running Wireshark version 1.12.0-1.12.8 or 2.0.0 and actively processing ZigBee ZCL Power Profile cluster packets with the vulnerable dissector.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Wireshark to version 1.12.9 or later (1.12.x) or 2.0.1 or later (2.0.x), or apply the vendor patch that adds bounds checking for the Total Profile Number field before array access.
Fix this in Wireshark
Scoped from the published advisory
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-8732 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-8732 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data