AndroidOperating system · Google

CVE-2015-9022

HIGH · 7.0 CVSS v3.0 Published 2017-06-13
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
73/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
In all Android releases from CAF using the Linux kernel, time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Conditions exist in several TZ APIs.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

TOCTOU race conditions in Android's Trusted Zone (TZ) APIs allow attackers to exploit the time gap between security checks and resource usage. This affects all CAF-based Android releases using the Linux kernel, potentially allowing privilege escalation or security bypass in the trusted execution environment.

MitigationApply CAF/Android kernel security patches for CVE-2015-9022 to fix the race conditions in affected TZ API functions; this requires a kernel update as the vulnerability is in the low-level trusted zone implementation.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
AndroidOperating system
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
High
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if the device uses a CAF-based kernel
    Check /proc/version or run 'uname -a' to see if the kernel string contains 'CAF' or Qualcomm-related identifiers
    Affected if The kernel is built by Code Aurora Forum (CAF) for Qualcomm-based devices
  2. Verify TrustZone/TZ is present
    Check for /dev/tz_driver or examine /sys/firmware/ for TrustZone-related entries; alternatively, look for 'tzd' or 'tz' in /proc/mounts
    Affected if The device has an active Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) implemented via ARM TrustZone
  3. Check kernel version against patch timeline
    Run 'getprop ro.build.version.security_patch' or check 'cat /proc/version' to obtain the kernel build date; compare to mid-2015 when CVE-2015-9022 was disclosed
    Affected if The security patch level predates June 2015 or the kernel version is older than 3.10-series CAF builds
  4. Inspect TZ API access permissions
    Examine /dev/ts for world-readable/writable permissions or check 'ls -la /dev/*tz*' to see if any TZ device nodes have insecure access controls
    Affected if Trusted Zone device nodes are accessible without proper SELinux restrictions or have overly permissive file modes
  5. Check for vulnerable TZ syscall exposure
    Look for /sys/kernel/debug/tz_* or /dev/qseecom entries; then verify if untrusted apps can directly invoke TZ functions via these interfaces
    Affected if TZ API endpoints are exposed to userspace applications without proper validation routines

The device is likely affected if it runs a CAF-based Qualcomm kernel with TrustZone enabled and has not received a 2015 or later security update addressing this TZ race condition vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply CAF/Android kernel security patches for CVE-2015-9022 to fix the race conditions in affected TZ API functions; this requires a kernel update as the vulnerability is in the low-level trusted zone implementation.

Fix this in Android Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation24.0 h
  • Testing16.0 h
  • Review / QA12.0 h
60.0 hours of engineering $10,480
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $16,768.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-9022 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-9022 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data