CVE-2015-9129
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Android before 2018-04-05 or earlier security patch level on Qualcomm Snapdragon Automobile, Snapdragon Mobile, and Snapdragon Wear MDM9206, MDM9650, MSM8909W, SD 210/SD 212/SD 205, SD 410/12, SD 425, SD 430, SD 450, SD 615/16/SD 415, SD 617, SD 625, SD 650/52, SD 808, SD 810, SD 820, SD 820A, SD 835, SD 845, and SD 850, if the size parameter passed to TZ_PR_CMD_CONTENT_SET_PROP is small, an integer underflow occurs.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceInteger underflow vulnerability in Qualcomm TrustZone (TZ) when processing the TZ_PR_CMD_CONTENT_SET_PROP command with a small size parameter. This allows memory corruption in the secure world, potentially enabling arbitrary code execution with the highest privileges, bypassing all Android application sandboxing and security boundaries.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Qualcomm chipset modelCheck the device specifications or use commands like 'cat /proc/cpuinfo' or 'getprop ro.hardware' to determine the Qualcomm processor modelAffected if The chipset is NOT one of: Mdm9206, Mdm9650, Msm8909w, Sd 210, Sd 212, Sd 205, Sd 410, or Sd 412
-
Verify TrustZone is presentConfirm the device uses Qualcomm TrustZone technology - check /proc/tee or consult device documentation for TrustZone/TEE presenceAffected if TrustZone is not present on the device (non-Qualcomm or older architecture)
-
Check TrustZone firmware versionQuery the TrustZone firmware version through manufacturer tools, diagnostic interfaces, or check the baseband/modem firmware version which typically includes TZ componentsAffected if The firmware version falls within the affected range: Mdm9206 (all versions), Mdm9650 (all versions), Msm8909w (all versions), Sd 210 (all versions), Sd 212 (all versions), Sd 205 (all versions), Sd 410 (all versions), Sd 412 (all versions)
-
Confirm Android security patch levelCheck the Android security patch level via 'getprop ro.build.version.security_patch' - this indicates whether the April 2018 patch or later has been appliedAffected if The security patch level is earlier than April 2018, indicating the vulnerability has not been patched
The device is affected if it uses any of the listed Qualcomm chipsets with TrustZone firmware versions that predate the April 2018 Android security patch.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the April 2018 Android security patch or later, which contains the fix for this TrustZone vulnerability. For end-of-life devices that cannot receive patches, consider device replacement as no effective workaround exists.
Android security patch level 2018-04-05 or later (or the latest available security patch from the device manufacturer)
- Check current Android security patch level on affected device
- Update device to Android with security patch level dated 2018-04-05 or later
- If the device manufacturer no longer provides security updates, consider migrating to a device that receives regular monthly security patches
- For embedded/IoT devices using these Qualcomm Snapdragon chips, contact the device manufacturer for firmware updates that incorporate the security patch
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation24.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $15,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-9129 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-9129 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data