CVE-2015-9135
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Android before 2018-04-05 or earlier security patch level on Qualcomm Snapdragon Mobile and Snapdragon Wear MDM9625, MDM9635M, MDM9640, MDM9645, MSM8909W, SD 210/SD 212/SD 205, SD 400, SD 410/12, SD 615/16/SD 415, SD 617, SD 650/52, SD 800, SD 808, and SD 810, in a QTEE syscall handler, an untrusted pointer dereference can occur.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn untrusted pointer dereference vulnerability exists in the QTEE (Qualcomm Trusted Execution Environment) syscall handler within the kernel of multiple Qualcomm Snapdragon Mobile and Snapdragon Wear processors. This memory safety flaw in the TEE subsystem could allow an attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution or privilege escalation by leveraging the trusted execution environment.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device chipset modelCheck /proc/cpuinfo or /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpuinfo for the processor identifier. On Android, you can also use 'getprop ro.hardware' or 'cat /proc/cmdline' to find the SoC model.Affected if The chipset matches one of the following: Qualcomm Mdm9625, Mdm9635m, Mdm9640, Mdm9645, Msm8909w, Sd 210, Sd 212, or Sd 205
-
Verify the specific firmware versionQuery the baseband or modem firmware version via 'getprop gsm.version.baseband' or check the TEE daemon version if accessible through /tee or /vendor/tee directory.Affected if Any firmware version is present on the affected chipset models listed in step 1 (all versions are vulnerable)
-
Confirm TEE subsystem presenceCheck for the presence of the Trusted Execution Environment by looking for /tee or /vendor/tee directories, or by checking if the TEE driver is loaded via 'lsmod' or /sys/kernel/debug/tee directory.Affected if The TEE subsystem is present and active on the device (required for the vulnerable code path to exist)
-
Check kernel TEE driver for the vulnerable syscall handlerExamine the compiled kernel for the QTEE syscall handler code if you have root access: search for 'qtee' or 'QTEE' references in /proc/kallsyms or the kernel image. This requires kernel debug symbols or source access.Affected if The QTEE syscall handler code exists in the running kernel (indicating the vulnerable component is present)
A device is affected if it contains any of the listed Qualcomm Snapdragon chipsets (Mdm9625, Mdm9635m, Mdm9640, Mdm9645, Msm8909w, Sd 210, Sd 212, Sd 205) and has the TEE subsystem enabled, regardless of firmware version.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the Android security patch level from 2018-04-05 or later, which includes the fix for this QTEE syscall handler vulnerability on affected Qualcomm Snapdragon devices. Users should check with their device OEM for available security updates.
Android Security Patch Level 2018-04-05 or later (contact device manufacturer for specific update)
- Check your current Android security patch level in Settings > About Phone > Android security patch level
- If the patch level is earlier than April 5, 2018, your device is vulnerable
- Update your device to the latest available Android security update from your device manufacturer
- For devices that no longer receive updates from the manufacturer, consider replacing the device with a model currently supported
- If a manufacturer update is available, install all pending system updates
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,712.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-9135 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-9135 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data