CVE-2015-9136
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Android before 2018-04-05 or earlier security patch level on Qualcomm Snapdragon Mobile and Snapdragon Wear MDM9206, MDM9607, MDM9640, MDM9650, SD 210/SD 212/SD 205, SD 425, SD 430, SD 450, SD 600, SD 625, SD 650/52, SD 808, SD 810, SD 820, SD 835, and SDX20, in pre-auth request, Host driver uses FT IEs sent by the supplicant. A buffer overflow may occur if FT IEs sent by the supplicant are larger than the expected value.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the Host driver of Qualcomm Snapdragon chipsets where FT IEs (Fast Transition Information Elements) sent by the supplicant are used without proper bounds checking. If the FT IEs exceed the expected size, a buffer overflow occurs in pre-authentication requests, potentially allowing remote code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Qualcomm chipset modelCheck the device specifications or use diagnostic tools (such as AT commands or firmware identification utilities) to determine the exact Qualcomm Snapdragon or Snapdragon Wear chipset model numberAffected if The chipset model is one of: Mdm9206, Mdm9607, Mdm9640, Mdm9650, Sd 210, Sd 212, Sd 205, or Sd 425
-
Check the firmware versionRetrieve the firmware version from the chipset using vendor-specific diagnostic tools or AT command interfaces (for example, AT+QVERSION or similar). Compare the firmware version against the affected version rangeAffected if The firmware version is any version (all versions are affected according to the advisory)
-
Determine if Wi-Fi is enabledCheck the device Wi-Fi status through the operating system network settings or wireless driver interface. Confirm that Wi-Fi functionality is activeAffected if Wi-Fi is enabled and the device is capable of transmitting or receiving wireless pre-authentication requests
-
Check if 802.11r Fast Transition is configuredInspect the wireless configuration settings or supplicant configuration (wpa_supplicant.conf) for the presence of 802.11r (FT) or Fast Transition parameters and mobility domain configurationsAffected if 802.11r Fast Transition is enabled and the device processes FT IEs in pre-authentication requests
The device is affected if it uses any of the listed Qualcomm chipsets (Mdm9206, Mdm9607, Mdm9640, Mdm9650, Sd 210, Sd 212, Sd 205, or Sd 425) with any firmware version and has Wi-Fi with 802.11r Fast Transition enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor security patch (April 2018 or later security patch level) to affected Android devices with vulnerable Qualcomm Snapdragon or Snapdragon Wear chipsets.
Android Security Patch Level April 2018 or later (contact device OEM for specific firmware版本)
- 1. Identify the affected device model and verify it contains one of the affected Qualcomm Snapdragon or MDM chipsets (MDM9206, MDM9607, MDM9640, MDM9650, SD 210, SD 212, SD 205, SD 425, or others listed in the full Android bulletin)
- 2. Check the current Android security patch level on the device (Settings > About Phone > Security Patch Level)
- 3. If the security patch level is earlier than April 5, 2018, the device is vulnerable
- 4. Contact the device manufacturer (OEM) to obtain an update to Android security patch level April 2018 or later
- 5. Apply the manufacturer-provided system update that includes the April 2018 Android Security Bulletin fixes
- 6. After updating, verify the security patch level shows April 2018 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-9136 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-9136 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data