CVE-2015-9149
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Android before 2018-04-05 or earlier security patch level on Qualcomm Snapdragon Automobile, Snapdragon Mobile, and Snapdragon Wear MDM9206, MDM9650, SD 210/SD 212/SD 205, SD 400, SD 410/12, SD 425, SD 430, SD 450, SD 615/16/SD 415, SD 617, SD 625, SD 650/52, SD 800, SD 808, SD 810, SD 820, SD 820A, SD 835, SD 845, and SD 850, in a DIAG ioctl handler, an untrusted pointer dereference can occur.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn untrusted pointer dereference vulnerability exists in the DIAG ioctl handler of multiple Qualcomm Snapdragon chipset variants (MDM9206, MDM9650, SD series). The DIAG is a diagnostic interface, and the handler fails to properly validate pointers passed from userspace, potentially allowing kernel-level code execution or memory corruption.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the chipset modelCheck the processor/chipset information using 'cat /proc/cpuinfo' on Android devices, or check system information on embedded devices using 'lspci' (for PCIe cards) or 'cat /proc/device-tree/model' on ARM-based systems. Look for Qualcomm Snapdragon identifiers such as MDM9206, MDM9650, SD210, SD212, SD205, SD400, SD410, or SD412.Affected if The chipset matches one of the affected models: MDM9206, MDM9650, SD210, SD212, SD205, SD400, SD410, or SD412.
-
Locate the DIAG device interfaceSearch for DIAG device nodes on the system. Common paths include /dev/diag, /dev/diag_arm9, /dev/modem, or /dev/diagmond. Use the command 'ls -la /dev/diag*' or 'ls -la /dev/*diag*' to enumerate available DIAG device files.Affected if A DIAG device node exists and is accessible (readable/writable by the current user or group).
-
Verify DIAG driver is loadedCheck if the DIAG kernel driver is loaded by examining loaded modules or driver status. On Linux systems, use 'lsmod | grep -i diag' or check /sys/module for a diag module. On Android, also check 'getprop' for diag properties or review /proc/driver/ entries.Affected if The DIAG diagnostic driver is loaded and active in the kernel.
-
Confirm DIAG ioctl interface accessibilityTest whether the DIAG device allows ioctl operations. If you have appropriate permissions, attempt to access the DIAG device or review the device permissions using 'ls -l /dev/diag' or equivalent path. Check if the device has read/write permissions for the application or user in question.Affected if The DIAG ioctl interface is accessible (device is openable or has non-restricted permissions).
A user is affected if they are running on a device with an affected Qualcomm Snapdragon chipset (MDM9206, MDM9650, or SD series variants) where the DIAG diagnostic interface is exposed and accessible on the system.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the Android security patch level from April 2018 or later, which includes the vendor fix for this chipset-level vulnerability. Affected users should obtain firmware updates from their device OEMs.
Android devices with 2018-04-05 Security Patch Level or later (contact device manufacturer for specific firmware updates)
- 1. Identify the device model and current Android version
- 2. Check if the device manufacturer has released an Android security patch level dated 2018-04-05 or later
- 3. If available, apply the system software update containing the April 2018 Android Security Bulletin patches
- 4. Verify the security patch level by going to Settings > About Phone > Security Patch Level and confirming it shows April 2018 or later
- 5. If the manufacturer has not released an update with the fix, consider flashing a custom ROM that incorporates the patched kernel/firmware or replace the device
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,072.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-9149 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-9149 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data