CVE-2015-9175
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Android before 2018-04-05 or earlier security patch level on Qualcomm Snapdragon Automobile, Snapdragon Mobile, and Snapdragon Wear MDM9206, MDM9650, MSM8909W, SD 210/SD 212/SD 205, SD 400, SD 410/12, SD 425, SD 430, SD 450, SD 615/16/SD 415, SD 617, SD 625, SD 650/52, SD 800, SD 808, SD 810, SD 820, SD 820A, SD 835, SD 845, and SD 850, lack of input validation could lead to an untrusted pointer dereference in wv_dash_core_generic_verify().
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a memory safety vulnerability in the Widevine DRM component (wv_dash_core_generic_verify) in Android's media stack running on Qualcomm Snapdragon processors. Lack of input validation allows an untrusted pointer dereference, potentially enabling memory corruption, arbitrary code execution, or denial of service. The vulnerability affects multiple Snapdragon chipset generations used in mobile, automotive, and wearable devices.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Qualcomm chipset modelCheck the device specifications or use system information commands (e.g., 'cat /proc/cpuinfo' or 'getprop ro.hardware') to determine the Qualcomm Snapdragon chipset variantAffected if The chipset is one of: Mdm9206, Mdm9650, Msm8909w, Sd 210, Sd 212, Sd 205, Sd 400, or Sd 410
-
Check the baseband firmware versionUse Android diagnostic tools or baseband information commands (e.g., 'getprop gsm.version.baseband' or 'cat /proc/version') to retrieve the firmware version for the affected chipsetAffected if The firmware version corresponds to the listed affected products (Mdm9206 Firmware, Mdm9650 Firmware, Msm8909w Firmware, Sd 210 Firmware, Sd 212 Firmware, Sd 205 Firmware, Sd 400 Firmware, or Sd 410 Firmware)
-
Confirm Widevine DRM is in useVerify that the device uses Widevine DRM for content protection by checking DRM configuration files or license information (e.g., check for Widevine CDM presence in /system/vendor/lib/mediadrm or via DRM info APIs)Affected if Widevine DRM is enabled and the device plays protected content using the wv_dash_core_generic_verify module
-
Verify Android security patch levelCheck the installed Android security patch level via 'Settings > About Phone > Security patch level' or command 'getprop ro.build.version.security_patch'Affected if The security patch level is earlier than April 2018, indicating the vendor fix has not been applied
A user is affected if their device contains one of the listed Qualcomm Snapdragon chipsets (Mdm9206, Mdm9650, Msm8909w, Sd 210, Sd 212, Sd 205, Sd 400, or Sd 410) with unpatched firmware and has Widevine DRM enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the April 2018 or later Android security patch level to receive the vendor fix. For device manufacturers/OEMs, this requires obtaining the patched firmware from Qualcomm and integrating it into the device software stack.
Any Android device with security patch level dated 2018-04-05 or later contains the fix for this vulnerability
- 1. Identify the affected device model and its current Android version and security patch level.
- 2. Check if the device manufacturer has released an Android security update for April 2018 (2018-04-05) or later.
- 3. If available, apply the latest available Android security update from the device manufacturer.
- 4. Verify the security patch level after update by going to Settings > About Phone > Software Information > Security Patch Level.
- 5. Confirm the patch level shows a date of 2018-04-05 or later.
- 6. If no update is available from the manufacturer, consider migrating to a newer device that receives regular security updates.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-9175 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-9175 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data