CVE-2015-9180
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Android before 2018-04-05 or earlier security patch level on Qualcomm Snapdragon Automobile, Snapdragon Mobile, and Snapdragon Wear MDM9206, MDM9650, SD 210/SD 212/SD 205, SD 410/12, SD 425, SD 430, SD 450, SD 600, SD 615/16/SD 415, SD 617, SD 625, SD 650/52, SD 800, SD 808, SD 810, SD 820, SD 820A, SD 835, SD 845, and SD 850, the response pointer passed from user space to SDMX_process is not checked before it is used. If the given response buffer length is smaller than 16 bytes, the response values will be written to a memory outside the buffer, possibly in the secure memory area.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA buffer overflow vulnerability in the SDMX_process function in Qualcomm Snapdragon processors allows a user-space caller to pass an undersized response buffer (< 16 bytes). The function does not validate the response pointer or buffer length before writing, causing data to be written beyond the buffer boundary into potentially secure memory regions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Qualcomm Snapdragon processor modelCheck system information or /proc/cpuinfo to identify the processor chip (e.g., Mdm9206, Mdm9650, Sd 210, Sd 212, Sd 205, Sd 820a, Sd 410, Sd 412)Affected if The processor model matches any of the affected products listed in the CVE (Mdm9206, Mdm9650, Sd 210, Sd 212, Sd 205, Sd 820a, Sd 410, Sd 412)
-
Check the baseband or modem firmware versionUse AT commands (e.g., ATI, AT+CGMR) or check /proc/version to retrieve the modem firmware version informationAffected if The firmware version is present and the device uses an affected Snapdragon processor from step 1
-
Verify the Android security patch levelCheck Settings > About Phone > Security patch level or run 'getprop ro.build.version.security_patch' via adbAffected if The security patch level is earlier than 2018-04-05, indicating the firmware fix has not been applied
-
Confirm SDMX functionality is in useReview if the device uses SDMX (Secure Data Management eXchange) services for content protection; this is typically used in media/DRM scenariosAffected if The device actively uses SDMX for processing and the conditions from steps 1-3 indicate an unpatched system
A user is affected if the device contains a listed Qualcomm Snapdragon processor (Mdm9206, Mdm9650, Sd 210, Sd 212, Sd 205, Sd 820a, Sd 410, or Sd 412) with a security patch level earlier than 2018-04-05 and the SDMX feature is in use.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the Android security patch level 2018-04-05 or later from the device OEM/carrier. This is a firmware-level vulnerability requiring a system update; individual developers cannot apply independent fixes.
Android security patch level 2018-04-05 or later (or OEM-specific firmware update containing the April 2018 security bulletin)
- Update the device to Android security patch level 2018-04-05 or later
- If the device OEM provides a specific firmware update for your model (MDM9206, MDM9650, SD 210/212/205, SD 410/412, SD 820a), apply that firmware update
- After updating, verify the Android security patch level in Settings > About Phone > Security Patch Level shows April 2018 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-9180 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-9180 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data