CVE-2015-9211
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Android before 2018-04-05 or earlier security patch level on Qualcomm Snapdragon Automobile, Snapdragon Mobile, and Snapdragon Wear MDM9206, MDM9650, MSM8909W, SD 210/SD 212/SD 205, SD 400, SD 410/12, SD 425, SD 430, SD 450, SD 615/16/SD 415, SD 617, SD 625, SD 650/52, SD 800, SD 808, SD 810, SD 820, SD 820A, SD 835, SD 845, and SD 850, while provising the Playready module, a buffer overread may occur if the message passed is large.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer overread vulnerability in the PlayReady DRM module on affected Qualcomm Snapdragon mobile processors and baseband chips. When processing large messages, the module fails to properly validate bounds, allowing reading beyond allocated buffer boundaries. This is a firmware-level flaw in the baseband/processor that is triggered when the device processes certain PlayReady content or messages.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify your device chipset modelCheck the device specifications or use system information tools (such as settings > about phone, or *#*#4636#*#* on Android) to determine the exact Qualcomm Snapdragon or modem chipset model numberAffected if The chipset matches any of: Mdm9206, Mdm9650, Msm8909w, Sd 210, Sd 212, Sd 205, Sd 400, or Sd 410
-
Check baseband/modem firmware versionAccess the baseband version through Android settings (About Phone > Baseband Version) or by running 'at+ver' command in modem diagnostic mode, or check via *#*#726633#*#* if availableAffected if The firmware version is present on any of the affected chipset models listed (all versions of these chips are vulnerable)
-
Verify PlayReady DRM is in useCheck if the device supports and uses PlayReady DRM for content protection - this can be observed in DRM information settings (Settings > Widevine DRM or similar) or by inspecting content playback logs when playing protected mediaAffected if PlayReady DRM is enabled or the device processes PlayReady-protected content
-
Check Android security patch levelNavigate to Settings > About Phone > Android Security Patch Level to see the installed patch dateAffected if The security patch level is earlier than April 2018 (patches released April 2018 or later contain the fix)
Your device is affected if it contains any of the listed Qualcomm chipsets (Mdm9206, Mdm9650, Msm8909w, Sd 210, Sd 212, Sd 205, Sd 400, Sd 410) with baseband firmware and the Android security patch level is before April 2018.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply Android security patch level from April 2018 or later, or obtain vendor-specific firmware update for affected devices. Users of vulnerable devices should avoid processing untrusted PlayReady content until patched.
Android Security Patch Level 2018-04-05 or later (or equivalent OEM firmware update containing the April 2018 Qualcomm security fix)
- Apply Android security patch level 2018-04-05 or later to receive the CVE-2015-9211 fix
- Verify the installed Android security patch level by going to Settings > About Phone > Android security patch level
- If the device does not support the April 2018 or later security patch, contact the device manufacturer or carrier for available firmware updates that address this vulnerability
- For embedded/IoT devices using the affected Qualcomm Snapdragon components (MDM9206, MDM9650, MSM8909W, SD series), obtain and apply firmware updates from the original equipment manufacturer that include the Qualcomm fix
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,744.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-9211 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-9211 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data