CVE-2015-9300
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe events-manager plugin before 5.5.7 for WordPress has multiple XSS issues.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe events-manager WordPress plugin before version 5.5.7 contains multiple Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities. XSS flaws allow attackers to inject malicious scripts into web pages viewed by other users, potentially leading to session hijacking, credential theft, or redirection to malicious sites. The medium severity rating indicates the vulnerability is exploitable but may require user interaction.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 5.5.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the Events Manager pluginIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins. Look for 'Events Manager' or 'Pixelite Events Manager' in the list of installed plugins.Affected if Plugin is not found in the installed plugins list (not applicable)
-
Verify the installed versionIn the Plugins list page, find the Events Manager plugin entry. The version number is displayed beneath the plugin name. Alternatively, check the plugin main file header in wp-content/plugins/events-manager/events-manager.php for the 'Version' comment.Affected if Version number displayed is less than 5.5.7 (e.g., 5.5.6, 5.5.5, etc.)
-
Confirm the plugin is activeIn Plugins > Installed Plugins, check if Events Manager shows 'Active' status under the plugin name. An inactive plugin with a vulnerable version would not be directly exploitable.Affected if Plugin version is below 5.5.7 AND the plugin status is Active
You are affected if the Events Manager plugin is installed with a version lower than 5.5.7 and the plugin is currently active on your WordPress site.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data5.5.7
Update the events-manager plugin to version 5.5.7 or later. If immediate updating is not possible, disable the plugin temporarily and review recent admin activity logs for signs of exploitation.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,376.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-9300 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-9300 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data